Silver certificates are a type of representative money issued between 1878 and 1964 in the United States as part of its circulation of paper currency. They were produced in response to silver agitation by citizens who were angered by the Coinage Act of 1873, which had effectively placed the United States on a gold standard. Since 1968 they have been redeemable only in Federal Reserve Notes and are thus obsolete, but they remain legal tender at their face value and hence are still an accepted form of currency. These are three banknotes from the 1934 series of silver certificates, designed by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing and comprising the denominations $1, $5 and $10. Each banknote bears a portrait of a different individual, identified above.Banknote design credit: Bureau of Engraving and Printing
A good photograph, map, or other graphic in an article can help clarify things. If you want one but are stumped, or totally lost about copyright rules, one really good way to find graphics is to type "public domain" into the Google image search window, along with an appropriate key word. An extra benefit is that you have a high probability of finding photographs that are legal under the Wikipedia rules. (Remember to copy down the artist's name and URL for recent photographs labeled "public domain", because you will need the information when you upload the graphic.)
Of course, you shouldn't forget to look on the Wikimedia Commons first—someone may already have done the hard work! (You can use images from the Commons in the same way as local Wikipedia ones.) Here is the link to Wikimedia Commons search.
To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{tip of the day}}
Things you can help with...
You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)
Editors are advised that Featured Articles promoted before 2016 are in need of review, if you had an article promoted to Featured status on or before 2016 please check and update your article before they are listed at FAR/C.
Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space
The Original Barnstar
As for supporting me at my Abuse response nomination and training me on how to use the abuse reports, I give you this barnstar. Plus, your contributions are perfect on articles and making them DYK's and GA, not only that, FA as well. Enjoy! Damirgraffiti|☺Say Yo to Me!☺ 22:00, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
The Featured Sound Barnstar
For keeping the FS process running and going above and beyond the call of duty I award you this barnstar. --Guerillero | My Talk 17:01, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
The MOTD Barnstar
I award the MOTD Barnstar to Ancient Apparition for helping to keep our project "alive" during this difficult time. Without you and your so precious help and contributions, we all probably would have seen the end of this project. A BIG THANK YOU!!! –pjoef (talk • contribs) 19:38, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
The Excellent User Page Award
Really cool, colourful user page. Well done! Oddbodz (talk) 09:37, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
A Small Graphic Designer's Barnstar
Your redesign of the adopt-a-user page is worthy of recognition. Great job! SwarmX 05:15, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
The Featured Sound Main Page Proposal Voter Barnstar
I was truly humbled by the overwhelming community support for the recent proposal to place featured sounds on the main page. The proposal closed on Tuesday with 57 people in support and only 2 in opposition.
It should take a few weeks for everything to get coded and tested, and once that is done the community will be presented with a mock up to assess on aesthetic appeal.
Finally, I invite all of you to participate in the featured sounds process itself. Whether you're a performer, an uploader, or just come across a sound file you find top quality, and that meets the featured sound criteria, you can nominate it at Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates. Featured sounds is also looking for people to help assess candidates (also at Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates.)
For your excellent work in the October 2010 Wikification Drive, you are awarded The Wikilink Barnstar! Thanks for your work! Ⓢock 03:57, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for all your help on my userpage and for being a friendly talk page stalker! :) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:40, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Fridae'sDoom has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, so I've officially declared today as Fridae'sDoom's Day! For being a great person and awesome Wikipedian, enjoy being the star of the day, Fridae'sDoom!
Thi's user know's that not every word that end's with s need's an apostrophe and will remove misused apostrophe's from Wikipedia with extreme prejudice.
to too two
This user thinks that too many people have no idea how to use words that they should have learned in grade two.
you one
This user knows that one should not use "you" in encyclopedia articles or other formal works.
their there they're
This user thinks that there are too many people who don’t know that they're worse than their own children at spelling!
than then
This user understands the difference between using "than" and "then."
your you're
This user thinks that if your grammar is incorrect, then you're in need of help.
its it's
It's really not that hard to use each word in its proper manner.
whom
This user insists upon using whom wherever it is called for, and fixes the errors of whomever he sees.
This user was been stealing his neighbour's wi-fi, but now has his own router. This user now locks his connection to avoid paying big bills because of his neighbours.
The motto of the AIW is Conservata veritate, which translates to, "With the preserved truth".
This motto reflects the inclusionist desire to change Wikipedia only when no knowledge would be lost as a result.
The motto of the AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTD is Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet, which translates to, "it is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia." This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.
On 25 July, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article DirectHit, which you recently nominated. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.