User talk:RecordAR

This is RecordAR's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: CredibleMeds (June 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not advertising exactly, but advocacy

This needs articles about the organization, not just references giving the scientific basis for its work.

And the current content gives the impression that the organization is focussing one one particular medical problem. The article needs mroe baance

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CredibleMeds and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:CredibleMeds, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 23:13, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RecordAR! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 23:13, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arizona Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics (June 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not advertising exactly, but advocacy

This needs articles about the organization, not just references giving the scientific basis for its work.

And the current content gives the impression that the organization is focussing one one particular medical problem. The article needs mroe baance

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arizona Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Arizona Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 23:14, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declare any connection

Hello, RecordAR. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the pages Draft:Arizona Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics and Draft:CredibleMeds, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:58, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No COI

Hello Worldbruce--

There is no conflict. I am self-employed as an independent college counselor and I live in Florida. I have no employees. CredibleMeds is not a competitor. The only connection I have to CredibleMeds is that my neighbor found the database useful and told me about it. (Health issues are a main topic of conversation in Florida.) I looked it up, CredibleMeds didn't have a Wiki page, and so I wrote one. Seriously, I'm a newbie & I didn't think it would be this difficult. When compiling resources, I sent an email to my graduate school colleagues, told them that I was writing a Wiki page, and I was looking for citations regarding TdP (my neighbor has the congenital condition). None of my colleagues are affiliated with CredibleMeds--or, at least, not to my knowledge. Because AZCERT hosts the database, I thought I should keep the entries separate but it might be best to combine the two articles and redirect CredibleMeds inquiries to the AZCERT page. Again, newbie rationale because I really don't know.

I am a bit confused by "publicising." I want people to know about the database. Is that publicizing? Also, am I supposed to ask CredibleMeds for permission before I write a page about it? Because I didn't.

Thanks for your help. RecordAR (talk) 00:52, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the more complete explanation of "we", "colleagues", and your areas of editing interest. You were correct not to have any contact with CredibleMeds regarding the draft. And it is good that you do not have a conflict of interest.

One of the problems with a COI is that it can affect an editor's ability to be neutral. That problem can arise even when there is no COI. Since you want people to know about the database, you'll need to be especially careful to report objectively about it, attribute opinions rather than stating them in Wikipedia's voice, and not let your own views color what you write.

With regard to whether the database and organization should be presented as separate topics or merged, and your other questions at the AfC help desk, I may solicit input from WikiProject Medicine. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:32, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CredibleMeds has been accepted

CredibleMeds, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Worldbruce (talk) 14:36, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your help! Much, much obliged. RecordAR (talk) 20:19, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AcuraStem (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

not yet notable undil they have a marketable drug. The refs are notices or pr, not substantial references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources,

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AcuraStem and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:AcuraStem, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 10:45, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:AcuraStem concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:AcuraStem, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:AcuraStem

Hello, RecordAR. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "AcuraStem".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:50, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]