User talk:Жълто и Черно

RfC

Since you seem knowledgeable on the matter, you might want to participate in the Request for Comment that we are having about the name of the club that currently participates in Bulgaria's top division and that claims to be CSKA Sofia. You can find the discussion here. Thank you.--Laveol ^T 13:34, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, he doesn't seem knowledgeable because he is a fan of another club. No matter how many new users that support the "CSKA-Sofia is Litex" theory pop up in to "support" the article split if they don't have reasonable and obvious undoubting facts they won't change anything.--The TV Boy (talk · contribs) 16:13, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My opinion was expressed, I hope that you will find it helpful if you have some questions or clarifications are needed somewhere, please don't hesitate to ask. Since Wikipedia is a magnificent source of information any kind of misleading information shouldn't be tolerated, this is why I hope when you make your final decision on the case all pages concerning the topic to be closed from vandalise editing.Жълто и Черно (talk) 18:59, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, you are the one entering the misleading and false information here. There are no two different CSKA clubs, the statistics are to be kept going onward for the CSKA club. "CSKA-Sofia" IS NOT A TRADEMARK NAME, for god's sake please stop it with that! I really hope at the end the administrators take some actions against the disruptive editing and unsourced and vandalised information that some users are trying to pass one. Double standard will never be a thing in Wikipedia, you can be sure in that.--The TV Boy (talk · contribs) 19:30, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Everything that I am entering is supported by links and official statements of BFU and UEFA and it is in order to have objective information, I don't have any personal interest towards the teams of CSKA, none of them. Жълто и Черно (talk) 07:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, its not, none of this is true. Borislav Mihaylov said that this CSKA firm is a legal successor to the old Litex firm, but it now represents CSKA Sofia because it got fully restructed and uses CSKA's trademark and brand. Litex with its same old brand and trademark is operated by a different firm registration. UEFA says that this firm PFC CSKA-Sofia EAD was made in order to substitute PFC CSKA AD as a caretaker for the CSKA brand. That's all.--The TV Boy (talk · contribs) 08:25, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ^{My name is}not^dave (talk/contribs) 18:52, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]