User talk:-xShaun809

January 2021

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 13:19, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Electromagnetic hypersensitivity, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 13:49, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ifnord:Where do all the oppressive admins copy and paste their sentences from? It reads so generically. -xShaun809 (talk) 13:53, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All your edits are attempts to crowbar your point of view into articles about a topic which has no mainstream scientific acceptance. You are free to publish your own web page about these things but Wikipedia isn't a soapbox for your viewpoint. Ifnord (talk) 13:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Acroterion (talk) 13:52, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Please see WP:NOTADVOCACY, your edits are disruptive. You need to discuss your changes on the talk pages. Ifnord (talk) 13:53, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

-xShaun809, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi -xShaun809! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Acroterion (talk) 22:36, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Acroterion: You are incredibly dishonest, millions of people worldwide suffer from electromagnetic hypersensitivity, we are real, we exist! -xShaun809 (talk) 13:41, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Tgeorgescu (talk) 14:32, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tgeorgescu:Shut the hell up, I'll shove your damn head into a microwave and we'll see whether you feel ill from EMF poisoning. -xShaun809 (talk) 17:38, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Acroterion (talk) 17:48, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]