User talk:130.94.122.xxx
Calisota, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Calisota satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calisota and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Calisota during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 03:44, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
The article Groupuscule has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- just a dictionary definition, coupled with the observation that fringe political groups fragment a lot. wiktionary already has an entry.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Prezbo (talk) 05:25, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of McDonald's for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article McDonald's is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McDonald's until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. AChicInTheLife (talk) 19:15, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Stevie Case for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stevie Case is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stevie Case until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 17:01, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
United States/Republican Party listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect United States/Republican Party. Since you had some involvement with the United States/Republican Party redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:33, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
A butterfly knot listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect A butterfly knot. Since you had some involvement with the A butterfly knot redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 03:47, 20 July 2019 (UTC)