Jump to content

User talk:14saints

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The lady of heaven

[edit]

Hi friend, Can you combine my Stub Draft:The lady of heaven with your article Draft:The Lady of Heaven, I wrote this stub because I thought that no one wrote about The lady of heaven movie.

Sorry I don't know How can I Talk in Wikipedia like the others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.236.41.23 (talk) 08:56, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, unfortunately I cannot combine your stub because it has many mistakes and inaccuracies, the main draft page will be published soon once there are more reliable sources as per wikipedias guidelines 14saints (talk) 14saints (talk)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Stephenson (August 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 09:07, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 14saints! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 09:07, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Stephenson (director) has been accepted

[edit]
John Stephenson (director), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

James-the-Charizard (talk to me!) (contribs) 04:58, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Lady of Heaven moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, The Lady of Heaven, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creepTalk 07:35, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Lady of Heaven (March 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
JSFarman (talk) 22:43, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Lady of Heaven (March 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
JSFarman (talk) 22:43, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Sandstein 22:20, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

14saints (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

to whom it may concern, I understand the reason why I have been blocked for and I appreciate that you are doing your job and this has come to my attention about the issues that I was causing. I will assure you that I will not use my account for the purpose of advertising or promotion again and will make productive contributions from a nuetral point of view and explore more pages to help with expanding. 14saints (talk) 23:07, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

What will you write about, now that you know you won't be unblocked to write about Draft:The Lady of Heaven? What exactly is your relationship to that film? How will you comply with WP:COI? Yamla (talk) 11:22, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

14saints (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am a fan of the film and have been following it closely online to report any news updates, I was unaware this was causing advertising spam and I request that I be unblocked from Draft:The Lady of Heaven as I have understood that reports should not be biased and needs a neutral point of view which I will be extremely careful about. Regarding what else I would write, well I am well aware of the film industry and I can write up film updates as well as noteable figures such as film directors, writers, producers etc as I have previously done on a limited basis.14saints (talk) 17:24, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If unblocked, you categorically will not be permitted to continue editing about The Lady of Heaven. Is there anything else you would be interested in contributing to? Seraphimblade Talk to me 18:40, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of The Lady of Heaven for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Lady of Heaven is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lady of Heaven until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:08, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]