User talk:181.118.15.105

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made on Talk:Macuto Bay raid. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Recent changes patrol

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (181.118.15.105) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page.

Again, welcome! --David Tornheim (talk) 04:43, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Bias in Venezuela articles

Thanks for your edit of concern at Macuto Bay raid, which I mostly agree with. I responded at length here:

• Talk:Macuto_Bay_raid#Bias

Please note that one reason the articles read as they do is because the sources that did not support Guaido were quickly eliminated ("deprecated") after Guaido proclaimed himself president:

• TeleSUR -- discussion opened 2/1/2019; closed 3/31/2019
• Venezuelanalysis -- discussion opened 2/11/2019; closed 3/31/2019
• HispanTV -- discussion 5/19/2019

Sources that do not follow the neo-liberal interpretation of facts continue to be eliminated:

• Media Research Center -- WP:RS/N#RfC:_Media_Research_Center_and_its_arms_(CNS,_Newsbusters,_MRCTV) 5/27/2020
• RT / Russia Today -- WP:RS/N#RfC:_RT_(Russia_Today) 5/27/2020
• Sputnik -- WP:RS/N#RfC:_Sputnik
• The Canary -- discussion (2020)

Compare with these sources which are considered generally reliable:

• Bellingcat which receives funding from the National Endowment for Democracy.
• CNN
• Forbes
• Financial Times
• The Economist

For the full list of "perennial sources" whose reliability has been assessed, see WP:RS/P. --David Tornheim (talk) 06:37, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Investigation

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/181.118.15.105. Thank you. ReyHahn (talk) 12:51, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Indendation on talk pages

Hi there,

Thanks for your edits. I'm just writing to ask you to please indent your comments on talk pages, to make the discussion more readable. You can indent your comments by putting one or more colons before each line of your comment.

For example, this is idented one level (:),

and this is indented two levels (::).

Best practice is to indent your comment one level more than the comment you are replying to.

If the indentation becomes too deep, like this, you can type "outdent" enclosed in double curly braces to return to the main level of indentation,

like so.

Thanks, and happy editing! — cmonghost 👻 (talk) 21:59, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, I was wondering how to do this. The interface is very confusing 181.118.15.105 (talk) 00:29, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

---