User talk:189.35.35.204

March 2020

Your recent editing history at Allied war crimes during World War II shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. (Hohum ^@) 17:30, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

sorry,it wont happen again189.35.35.204 (talk) 18:47, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can help

I can try and help you write me a list of what you need help with. Just please know what you copying as one of the sources was to a food page, I am going to post to your main account.Driverofknowledge (talk) 17:34, 28 March 2020 (UTC) in the page Battle of Montese,i need to put the battle info,or pep will dont understand what the article is[reply]

I can try can you post a link to my page where, the info is from so I can look at it?Driverofknowledge (talk) 20:48, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

this page: https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batalha_de_Montese (its in portuguese,u will need to translate the combat info)

Ok I will tryDriverofknowledge (talk) 21:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Input

If you want to bring over more pages, let me help so we don't end up putting a food source as a source for a battle. Just leave a message on my page, So I know what you need help with so I can look it over.Driverofknowledge (talk) 21:39, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. El_C 04:15, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

sorry El_C,it wont happen again189.35.35.204 (talk) 15:06, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

uhhhhhh....why was i banned?

i dont know why i was banned,what i did wrong?i was just editing when i got blocked for no reason.

well,at least i can say stuff at the talk page

Block Revision Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

189.35.35.204 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

what happened??

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:11, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

why i was blocked???????? what i did wrong,even if i just joined today? and also,what is the reason to banning me? {{checkUser Block}} isnt a reason to block anyone (i think)

alright.sorry if the thing i will make gets too long,but i will do what you said

Block Revision

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

189.35.35.204 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

sorry if i did anything wrong,i SWEAR i wont do this again,even though i dont know what happened,if i did anything wrong,sorry for the incovenience,i will make more useful contributions (like i did in Italian Campaign and Battle of Montese),i will not cause ANY other damage or disruption to the Wikipedia,i understand the rules (no vandalism,swear,continuous insisting on the same edit,spam,etc)and i will respect them 189.35.35.204 (talk) 19:30, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you don't know what you did wrong, we can't be assured that you won't do it again. 331dot (talk) 19:51, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talk page access revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:53, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Invasion of Poland, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Denniss (talk) 07:49, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.