User talk:192.36.202.254

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Create new pages and rename pages
Edit semi-protected pages
Upload images
Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (192.36.202.254) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a new Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 15:42, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Haloperidol, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 08:12, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Haloperidol, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 08:17, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The text you actually remove is much better with facts and has more science.--192.36.202.254 (talk) 08:20, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war warning

Your recent editing history at Haloperidol shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 15:54, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war warning

Your recent editing history at Ziprasidone ‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 07:34, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is ok. I understand. What source was you out for ?--192.36.202.254 (talk) 07:35, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You told: "No source", actually it was very sourced much.--192.36.202.254 (talk) 07:36, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Basic policies

Please read WP:OR, WP:V, and WP:MEDRS.

Please stop adding to content to Wikipedia that says things like: "X was invented in 1945" where you cite a patent from 1945 claiming a bunch of things. It is your original research that the patent is the correct one. You need a source that say that is the correct patent. Jytdog (talk) 07:36, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

^[1]

"Ziprasidone was first synthesized on the Pfizer central research campus in Gorton, connecticut"

^[2]

Ziprasidone HCl has very low solubility in water (0.08 mg/ml). Increase in specific surface area (SSA) of low aqueous solubility materials may improve therapeutic activity (J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 26 (14 Aug. 1993) B181-B187).

No early sign of Ziprasidone is found but it existed clearly in 1993 this indicate. Edit war occurs because you was not honest with me from the early beginning what source you needed...--192.36.202.254 (talk) 07:43, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I skip the year but I will add this:

^[3]

"Ziprasidone was first synthesized on the Pfizer central research campus in Gorton, connecticut"

To your latest Version.--192.36.202.254 (talk) 07:48, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

Yes this works! Now please also take time to format your refs. Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 07:52, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please Read this soruce more clearly.. you removed one soruce that proved the text.

It's written: "5HT2C antagonist action as a mechanism for increasing both NE and DA ".

"5HT2C antagonist actions that boost serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine"

--192.36.202.254 (talk) 07:53, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

COPYRIGHT VIOLATIONS AND WIKIPEDIA

READ WP:ELNEVER Jytdog (talk) 08:52, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ok.--192.36.202.254 (talk) 09:50, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Ziprasidone does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Peaceray (talk) 15:48, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2022

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Aditya Birla Group, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 12:49, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vodafone India. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Maria Gemmi (talk) 12:54, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nagaland, you may be blocked from editing. FazilyFN (talk) 12:57, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Dimapur. Adakiko (talk) 13:20, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism, as done at Guyana.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:38, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

January 2023

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chandigarh, you may be blocked from editing. Arjayay (talk) 12:34, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Aditya Birla Sun Life Asset Management. - Arjayay (talk) 12:36, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:40, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.

[1] ttps://books.google.se/books?id=Xx7iNGdV25IC&pg=PA641&lpg=PA641&dq=ziprasidone++synthesized&source=bl&ots=Uub2BtahLu&sig=6iruKoFuXgBFOQlbK8d60p-y77E&hl=sv&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiwzqTbquHPAhWhJJoKHYx2CKAQ6AEIRTAF#v=onepage&q=ziprasidone%20%20synthesized&f=false

[2] ttp://www.google.ca/patents/US7678799

[3] ttps://books.google.se/books?id=Xx7iNGdV25IC&pg=PA641&lpg=PA641&dq=ziprasidone++synthesized&source=bl&ots=Uub2BtahLu&sig=6iruKoFuXgBFOQlbK8d60p-y77E&hl=sv&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiwzqTbquHPAhWhJJoKHYx2CKAQ6AEIRTAF#v=onepage&q=ziprasidone%20%20synthesized&f=false

[1]

[2]

[3]