User talk:1BGhimire

July 2021

Hello, I'm SS49. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ram Bahadur Thapa have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. ~SS49~ {talk} 12:04, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at KP Sharma Oli. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Yeti Dai (talk) 05:46, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for disruptive editing. Specifically, edit warring and poor communication. Please use article talk pages to discuss contested edits rather than continuing to re-add them. The approach of seeking to see your changes retained by brute force is faulty and not sustainable in the long term. Also, please be especially mindful of the Biographies of living persons policy. Thank you. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. El_C 06:09, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The user yetidai is clearly biased and is changing factua; information for no reason, i have put cited information, please check.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 1BGhimire (talk • contribs)

1BGhimire, learn the basics first. Then, you'd be able to communicate whatever you're trying to say effectively. Otherwise, it's not going to work out, regardless of anything. For example, signing your comment (WP:SIG) with a timestamp so it's clear it was stated by you and when. And where to comment — for example, you just placed an unsigned comment inside the block message, making it appear as if I had said it. Use article talk pages, because edit summaries are not enough. See Help:Introduction. Good luck. El_C 06:47, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at KP Sharma Oli. Please refrain from edit warring. You have been blocked once already for edit warring. Yeti Dai (talk) 16:13, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:1BGhimire reported by User:Yeti Dai (Result: ). Thank you. Yeti Dai (talk) 18:09, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here Clear violation of WP:BIAS and WP:POV by the other users on the article.  Blocking for no concrete reasons! Cited sources are not from parliamentary bulletin news of Nepal and the users are sockpuppets. Yet you are blocking me indefinitely for biased reasons. I ask you remove this block immediately! ~~~~}}

. Bbb23 (talk) 18:26, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]