User talk:2009cATBOOK

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ariel Vanderhorst (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ariel Vanderhorst and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 16:50, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello, 2009cATBOOK! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 16:50, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, 2009cATBOOK!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, S0091 (talk) 16:51, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: A.J. Vanderhorst (September 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:A.J. Vanderhorst and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 03:09, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: A.J. Vanderhorst (September 20)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Mcmatter was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 03:14, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, 2009cATBOOK. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 03:16, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

@McMatter: Hi there. I think you forgot to state the reason for your COI claim. I'm trying to track this down and help, thanks. — Smuckola(talk) 00:58, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Children’s Fountain (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Children’s Fountain and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 01:33, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andreé Seu Peterson (February 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andreé Seu Peterson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 02:36, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andreé Seu Peterson (February 4)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by I dream of horses was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: You just resubmitted the draft without adding sources. I guess that means none exist.

I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 04:07, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 500 East Eighth Street (February 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:500 East Eighth Street and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 04:48, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 500 East Eighth Street (February 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:500 East Eighth Street and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:54, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 500 East Eighth Street (February 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:500 East Eighth Street and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 20:03, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ariel Vanderhorst

Hello, 2009cATBOOK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ariel Vanderhorst, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:A.J. Vanderhorst

Hello, 2009cATBOOK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:A.J. Vanderhorst, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Downtown Kansas City Renaissance

Hello, 2009cATBOOK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Downtown Kansas City Renaissance, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Ariel Vanderhorst

Hello, 2009cATBOOK. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ariel Vanderhorst".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:16, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:A.J. Vanderhorst

Hello, 2009cATBOOK. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "A.J. Vanderhorst".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:48, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Downtown Kansas City Renaissance

Hello, 2009cATBOOK. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Downtown Kansas City Renaissance".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:49, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Children’s Fountain

Hello, 2009cATBOOK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Children’s Fountain, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Grand Apartments (June 29)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Taking Out The Trash was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Individual buildings within a city are generally not notable unless they are nationally or internationally recognized, or have some important historic value to them. This article satisfies neither of those criteria.

Taking Out The Trash (talk) 21:37, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Technopat (talk) 22:35, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. Your talk page is a wall of warnings about a flagrant disregard of encyclopedic concepts. You need to stop editing altogether until you learn and accept what an encyclopedia is. It is not your weblog, your soapbox, or your newspaper. WP:NOT You keep inserting WP:OR with no WP:RS and just generally robotically spamming unencyclopedic content such as useless draft stubs, while disregarding all warnings and guidance. You can't create these articles, so please stop. You've even disregarded a warning about WP:COI. WP:COI and WP:OR are the most extreme violations possible. You obviously don't even care that it's all been deleted and obviously will continue to be deleted, at the waste of the time and energy of countless volunteers let alone of yourself. You're going to be reported to admins and users can be blocked for all of these behaviors. You absolutely must respond to the WP:COI warning. I scanned all your edits for anything salvageable as a basis for supporting your interests in an encyclopedic way, even a WP:RS, and I just can't. — Smuckola(talk) 00:32, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Andreé Seu Peterson

Hello, 2009cATBOOK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Andreé Seu Peterson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:500 East Eighth Street

Hello, 2009cATBOOK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:500 East Eighth Street, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Andreé Seu Peterson

Hello, 2009cATBOOK. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Andreé Seu Peterson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:10, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources. [1][2][3] and you made yet another junk unencyclopedic draft, the worst ever Draft:PublicSq while failing to respond to this page. — Smuckola(talk) 07:10, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023

Hello, I'm Serge, an Admin here on Wikipedia. I'm a little bit concerned about some of your conduct on Wikipedia.

• You've got a lot of warnings related to sourcing. This is concerning because so much of how Wikipedia functions is according to what sources say.
  • Please follow WP:V and make sure you source all content you add to Wikipedia. I've seen you make multiple unsourced edits very recently, despite you showing in other edits that you know how to add sources. Please, use them every time.
  • Please make more of an effort to make sure that your article creations/draft meet the WP:GNG. You shouldn't be having so many drafts be rejected like this.
• Additionally, Wikpedia is a collaborative project. When editors bring concerns to you, you have an obligation to discuss them. If things are brought to your attention, but you don't respond, its frustrating to editors, and it makes it look like you're not interested in following policies and guidelines around here.

Please try to improve on these ground. Too many issues without improvement can lead to your account being blocked from editing - either temporarily or indefinitely. So please start taking these talk page comments more seriously.

If you have questions, feel free to response here or at my talk page. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 18:09, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

I’ll do better research for sources in the future! 2009cATBOOK (talk) 21:51, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Reliable secondary sources. WP:RS. Not commercial advertisements. Not Zillow or Redfin or whatever. You just now replied with "I’ll" with curly decorative punctuation, which is not allowed (MOS:CURLY). None of your drafts should have ever been published even as drafts, and should all be deleted. Rather, you should use your personal sandbox once you've determined that the subject is even notable (WP:N) according to a preponderance of reliable sources and substantial coverage within them, and not just fluff pieces of daily news written in passing (WP:NOTNEWS). Start with just finding reliable sources with substantial coverage of existing article content, like something that needs backup sources or that has a "citation needed" tag. Or, I see that you like some census data, so update those numbers and their sources (like the access-date if the same page content has been updated at the same URL), but only according to how it's been officially formatted by the Census Bureau and by the deeply experienced editors for that sacred public data. This has all wasted significant time and effort of volunteers as if you couldn't care less that your own time and effort is wasted while you constantly repeat it all.

Nonetheless, the Wikipedia project is the world's largest disaster at luring new users under false pretenses of "anything goes", failing to orient new users, and then punishing everybody for it. — Smuckola(talk) 23:39, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

The first thing to do before editing anything is to address the WP:COI allegation above, here. Was that user referring to some drafts you made or is your username referencing some book you're affiliated with or what? I see you updated some census data with sources, but with the new mess of bare URLs right after I told you to update all the metadata, and you clearly know what that is from reading any Wikipedia article. You marked that as a minor edit for no reason, which it absolutely is not. A minor edit is an option for users to avoid receiving notifications about, like a truly trivial update of a typo or of metadata or of wording without changing any meaning. Ideally, the lead of any article will not have any citations at all, but this small article is a big work in progress that lacks a 2020 census section (WP:LEADCITE). This is called editorialization, where you took the word of one source and stated it in Wikipedia's voice as an objective fact without attribution. One should say "Source X called Y a Z." but I have no idea who that source is, whether it's a WP:RS, or why you cited them. WP:ATTRIBUTION You are not a level to be doing that, as I already told you. You should focus on being a perfect WP:WIKIGNOME. — Smuckola(talk) 01:31, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

I also have some concerns. At Lee's Summit, Missouri, you wrote, "In recent years, Lee's Summit has become one of the fastest growing cities in Missouri". You sourced your edit with a link to "Stacker". What are "recent years", and by "fastest growing" do you mean "fastest growing population", or is the city annexing its neighbors? Speaking of "its", with this edit did you mean "its"? Also, please stop adding bare URLs as references. Please consider making test edits to your sandbox, and then adding them to mainspace only when you are absolutely certain they are spelled correctly and are encyclopedic in tone. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:10, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

@Magnolia677: Yes, WP:RECENTISM. I have never heard of Stacker and it does have an editorial staff, but I don't know any of their credentials. What I do know is that this editor has a long history of making WP:OR out of indiscriminate pure garbage sources like Zillow listings, for using Wikipedia as a personal weblog WP:NOTBLOG. So I doubt. WP:CIR — Smuckola(talk) 20:54, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

There is no such thing as "September of 2022" or 25th or Sunday, January 1, 2023 or anything like that. Date formats are MOS:DATE[4]. Now answer your COI allegation. — Smuckola(talk) 05:11, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

COI? I’m just going to log out and be done with the conformity of Wikipedia. As a former contributor to Emporis, I was respected and routinely promoted-but this is not the the same and I respectfully quit. 2009cATBOOK (talk) 16:28, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: South Loop Link has been accepted

South Loop Link, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Imzadi 1979 → 07:13, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:One Light

Hello, 2009cATBOOK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:One Light, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: One Light (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:One Light and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 18:53, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: PublicSq. (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tagishsimon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PublicSq. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tagishsimon (talk) 21:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Grand Apartments

Hello, 2009cATBOOK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Grand Apartments, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Southwest Missouri (December 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Umakant Bhalerao was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Southwest Missouri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 07:16, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Southwest Missouri (December 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Southwest Missouri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 23:03, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Grand Apartments

Hello, 2009cATBOOK. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Grand Apartments".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:38, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:500 East Eighth Street

Hello, 2009cATBOOK. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "500 East Eighth Street".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Schminnte ^{[talk to me]} 16:56, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Southwest Missouri

Hello, 2009cATBOOK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Southwest Missouri, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Southwest Missouri

Hello, 2009cATBOOK. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Southwest Missouri".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:59, 24 June 2024 (UTC)