Jump to content

User talk:201.182.80.18

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Schminnte. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Knights of the Zodiac (film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Schminnte (talk contribs) 00:40, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Knights of the Zodiac (film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 00:50, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Can you please read what I posted on the talk section so we can end with this? I have solid evidence that the movie didn't cost 60 millions dollars. Plase read it.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Knights of the Zodiac (film). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 03:35, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Knights of the Zodiac (film). We do not put down "unknown" if a film's budget is unknown. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 22:59, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Third opinion

[edit]

Hi IP201, and thanks for seeking out a third opinion. Since there has not been thorough discussion, I declined the request. It may take time for other interested editors to read and respond to your comment. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:58, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no discussion because the other guy didn't read the evidence I've quoted... What am I gsupposed to do?
If you guys just take 1 minute to check the links I've provided you will see I'm right. 201.182.80.18 (talk) 06:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]