User talk:201.229.37.2

May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia:Manual of Style. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. E Wing (talk) 14:27, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Amani Toomer has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Marek.69 ^talk 03:59, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

April 2010

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to LaGuardia Airport, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Snoozlepet (talk) 20:01, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

June 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Renewable energy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. E8 (talk) 17:41, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

August 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of best Major League Baseball season won-loss records with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. WayneSlam 01:01, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

March 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Good Luck Charlie, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:47, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

January 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Menville. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Please do not remove content added by others. Inks.LWC (talk) 02:19, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Edits on the Osteopathic manipulative medicine article

Hi there 201, I see you made some edits to the OMM/OMT page lately. Wikipedia has a lot of guidelines and the most relevant ones for editing this particular article are WP:MEDRS and WP:BRD. It's far more likely that the edits you suggest (on any page) will be incorporated successfully if you manage to work within the confines of these guidelines and policies. Above all else, if someone reverts your edits, it's not really considered good form to undo their reversion (whether you're right or not, it's always best to take it to the talk page and discuss). If reversions go back and forth, it is possibly (and very likely) that you will end up getting yourself blocked from Wikipedia and that's certainly not a desirable outcome. If you have any interest in discussing this matter or the contents of your proposed edits, I would be happy to discuss them here on your talk page, on mine, or on the article's talk page. Happy editing! TylerDurden8823 (talk) 22:37, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2017

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:13, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from changing genres without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:04, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Incubus (band), you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 21:15, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

---