User talk:208.54.5.159

November 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Portal:Contents/Outlines/People and self. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 13:48, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Template:Latest preview software release/Microsoft Visual Studio, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. ScottSteiner ✍ 16:28, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Yes California have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 02:19, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yes California. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Qzd (talk) 02:25, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Yes California, you may be blocked from editing. Donner60 (talk) 02:29, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Words to watch. Wikipedia is not a blog, forum, fan site, advice site, publisher of original research, soapbox or directory. It is an encyclopedia based on reliable, verifiable, third-party sources. It does not include personal opinions, commentary, speculation, suggestions, directions or advice to the reader, rumors, disparaging assertions or unsourced information any of which is likely to be changed, challenged, disputed or wrong. See Wikipedia:Five Pillars, Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources, Help:Footnotes, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. For further information about contributing to Wikipedia, see: Getting started; Introduction to Wikipedia; Wikipedia:Simplified ruleset; and Wikipedia:Simplified Manual of Style. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 02:31, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Yes California. Materialscientist (talk) 02:47, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:19, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Materialscientist: I hope you realize that the vandal simply continued as IP 208.54.5.176 . Curly "the jerk" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 03:34, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Donald Glover— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:55, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hey, there is no need to report an IP if it made one bad edit half a day ago (like 72.162.93.4, 165.234.100.36, etc.). Save your time, and mine. Materialscientist (talk) 04:07, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist: Yeah, those (and some others) were borderline reportable in my mind, but I just wasn't sure what your judgment would be with some of them... In case if you were wondering, I find most of the IP addresses/accounts from patrolling this (although ClueBot makes lots of fp's), which I try to sort through as best as I can)... 208.54.5.159 (talk) 04:13, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, you did block both of those IP's, so I'm not sure why you are mentioning those ones... if you felt like they didn't have sufficient activity to warrant a block you could have just removed those ones, too. 208.54.5.159 (talk) 04:19, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There are no solid rules on when to block, but better not to push admins when not needed. Materialscientist (talk) 04:42, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, following Cluebot edits is not very productive. To find vandals, I'd better use filter logs [1]. If you can't see that page, maybe you can see individual filters like [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] etc.

You seem to nod, yet keep going. There was no use reporting 205.154.248.7 (talk · contribs). Materialscientist (talk) 04:50, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, I had that IP open in another tab way before we were discussing this... 208.54.5.159 (talk) 04:52, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, thanks for providing the filter links above. The only one that isn't visible is this one (ID: 380). 208.54.5.159 (talk) 04:55, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, 208.54.5.159. You have new messages at NeilN's talk page.
Message added 05:45, 1 March 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Home Lander (talk) 05:45, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. I noticed that you recently removed some content from User talk:130.126.255.46 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Iryna Harpy (talk) 08:52, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.