User talk:20editor16

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! -- samtar ^whisper 10:39, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted link at Computer forensics

Hi. I'm a regular volunteer over at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. I concur that your request there should be closed for lack of discussion, but I thought that I'd drop you a note to perhaps forestall further confusion about this issue. When KH-1 reverted your link in this edit, it was entirely proper for two different reasons:

The reason stated by KH-1: "doesn't support content/not about the case in question." A citation in that place should be for supporting the assertion that "Hard drives were analyzed by a computer forensics expert" immediately preceding the citation. We don't use citations in that manner to define a term unless the text being supported by the citation is, in fact, the definition of the term.
A reason not stated by KH-1, but one which is frankly a bigger problem. The citation does not point to a reliable source as defined by Wikipedia. Please click on that link and read that definition and then drop down (or click this link to jump to it) and read the section on Self-published sources. The website that you linked to is a self-published site and, as such, is not a reliable source for Wikipedia purposes (especially, but not only, since the essay — actually a blog post — you linked to was written by a site administrator of that site). Links to sources which are not reliable sources can be removed.

Thank you for trying to help to improve Wikipedia, we really appreciate it. It can be pretty tough to get started and because those of us who are regulars do so much we sometimes don't take the time to explain things fully to newcomers. There's an excellent resource for newcomers, however (in addition to all the links in the greeting given to you, above) and that's the Wikipedia Teahouse which is staffed by a bunch of great folks who will help you sort your way through any problems you have. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 18:16, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]