User talk:2601:2C3:8681:6660:98B5:81A6:93D:1836

September 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  PhilKnight (talk) 14:49, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2601:2C3:8681:6660:98B5:81A6:93D:1836 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Phil Knight (User:PhilKnight) is a hypocrite of the most odious kind. He doesn't even understand the charge of disruption he's leveling at myself, much less is able to defend it. Phil thinks he himself is somehow defending someone by lawlessly concealing evidence of their wrongdoing. If he's too histrionic to defend why pointing out the abuse of the Judeans/Edomites is too big a luxury to see aired out when proposing changes to the Prelude to the Russian invasion of Ukraine article, he's contributing nothing but passive-aggressive preening by lavishing attention on the fact "his highness" is lawlessly entitled to speak with the utmost brevity in the negative to those objecting to his fishbowl-like discussion he's maintaining. And all in the service of tyrannically doling out from some monopolistic racket in which he's participating what actually belongs to every American as their birthright. That is, a free and open discussion of the issues, regardless of political orientation. Mark my words, Phil is going end up as the scapegoat of the very pseudo-progressive plantation system, the edifice from whose hierarchical heights he's now treating myself so disdainfully, because the elites always have to be right, and when they get caught being wrong, it's someone else's fault by that inflexible further preening rule of forcing their "enemies" to criticize them, because self-criticism amounts to an admission you don't excel others that they can use to dislodge you from your office. And all this behind the backdrop of what amounts to the servile fear that being exposed as incompetent is somehow worse for you than maintaining an office in the face of a systemwide collapse that's too big to gloss over by reducing that incompetence to an honor contest then defending the absurd translation by endless and tiresome provocations.

Decline reason:

I take it that you didn't actually expect this to get you unblocked. JBW (talk) 21:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

---