User talk:50.226.46.222

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 50.226.46.222, is registered to Comcast Cable and may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

August 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Death of Prince. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Stop recreating articles that have been redirected after an AFD. You've done it twice to this article and once to Reactions to the death of Prince. You can open discussions on the parent articles' talk pages about splitting the articles, but do not keep recreating them. Meters (talk) 22:27, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Death of Prince, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 22:30, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Death of Prince. It was redirected at AFD. It needs consensus to split. You having started a discussion 4 minutes earlier is not consensus to split the article. Meters (talk) 22:40, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Meters: Can you please stop following me around and reverting my edits? I want to hear your thoughts on the Death of Prince having its own article. There aren't any responses yet, and I even mentioned your name in the discussion. See Talk:Prince (musician) and talk to me about this. 50.226.46.222 (talk) 23:06, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've redirected Prince Rogers Nelson‎ to Prince (musician). We do not need another article at his birth name. This is a clear case for a redirect from a birth name. Stop creating all of these articles.

And as for [1] and the above, t's entirely up to me when I comment on a thread, or if I choose to do so at all. As a matter of fact, I had already commented at Talk:Prince (musician) before you posted the above. Perhaps you should have looked first. Meters (talk) 23:12, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IP, I concur with what Meters is saying. You need to stop trying to recreate articles that were turned into redirects due to a properly run AFD. If you don't understand this process, please by all means feel free to ask. However, continuing to edit war as you have done and try to force the recreation of these articles is going to end in you very likely being blocked. Please stop. --Hammersoft (talk) 03:03, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 19:49, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

August 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~ Araratic | talk 23:37, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Purple rain (film), you may be blocked from editing. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 03:25, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Prince (singer). Donner60 (talk) 03:26, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spencer^T•C 03:29, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

50.226.46.222 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Listen, I'm so fucking sorry for being such a bad user. Can you please unblock my fucking IP and let me talk to somebody? 50.226.46.222 (talk) 21:26, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Optimist on the run (talk) 21:34, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

50.226.46.222 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that what I did was completely wrong and I won't do it again. I'm not stupid at all. Wikipedia's rules are stupid, which is why I want to make this website great again. This site just doesn't need rules anymore. Let me do whatever the fuck I want. 50.226.46.222 (talk) 22:01, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

While you hold these beliefs about Wikipedia you have no chance of being unblocked. ----Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:07, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

50.226.46.222 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please let me edit Wikipedia again. I won't add anymore nasty things about Prince anymore. I'll be a much better editor from now on. In this case, blocking me is completely pointless. If you want to talk to me personally, my phone number is (redacted). 50.226.46.222 (talk) 22:18, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Removing talk page access due to numerous disruptive requests. RickinBaltimore (talk) 22:53, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.