User talk:50.30.100.33

November 2016

Hello, I'm Mr. Vernon. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Greater Wynnewood Exotic Animal Park without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mr. Vernon (talk) 00:01, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Greater Wynnewood Exotic Animal Park shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Mr. Vernon (talk) 00:10, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Greater Wynnewood Exotic Animal Park, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 00:11, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.  Black Kite (talk) 00:41, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Greater Wynnewood Exotic Animal Park

If what you say about being the owner of the park is true, you should probably be aware that Wikipedia isn't necessarily what is true, but rather what is verifiable. We go by what reliable, typically third party sources say. Otherwise, anyone would be able to come onto Wikipedia and make whatever claims they want. We also aim to maintain a neutral point of view. If you believe that the article is not up-to-date, perhaps the best course of action would be to add an update template at the top of the page, and then take your concerns to the article's Talk Page for discussion. This would be more productive, as edit warring and making legal threats are against our policies and won't get you anywhere on Wikipedia. I hope this has been helpful. DarkKnight2149 00:57, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

---