User talk:70.30.30.243

October 2022

Personal attacks are not tolerated on this site. If you cannot interact with other editors without making baseless accusations, you will be blocked from editing.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:09, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Saying that people who misgender a trans women are transphobic is not only not baseless the proof of the accusation is right there in their own behaviour. Or would you care to provide some *other* explanation for why so many cis people are so eager to say that a trans woman is a man? 70.30.30.243 (talk) 23:10, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read through the extensive article talk page discussions specifically regarding the use of pronouns in the article. You can disagree with the consensus, and you can start a discussion to revisit the topic, but you cannot treat Wikipedia as a battleground while hurling insults at anyone who disagrees with you.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:15, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, yes, I must start a discussion with the gang of cisgender people who decided to misgender her. Hmmm, I wonder how that will go... /s Stop making excuses to be a bigot. 70.30.30.243 (talk) 23:17, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article does not use gendered pronouns. Unless you have a source stating that D'Eon's preferred pronouns were she/her, we cannot put that in the article. ... discospinster _talk 23:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

She literally had the King of France recognise her as female and that information is right there in the article. You are clearly not interested in intellectual honesty if it gets in the way of your efforts to misgender a trans women so there no point in further discussion. Kindly mind your own business and leave trans things to trans people. 70.30.30.243 (talk) 23:15, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not all women use she/her pronouns. So again, unless you have some proof that D'Eon used these pronouns then it can't go in the article. ... discospinster _talk 23:16, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now you're just being rediculous. 70.30.30.243 (talk) 23:18, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:16, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:20, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:37, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.