User talk:76.65.74.178

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

76.65.74.178 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am being incorrectly mistaken for a LTA blocked user that I have myself reverted a couple of disruptive edits. [1][2] The LTA blocked user was violating the WP:CRYSTAL policy by adding in the infobox stuff that haven't happened yet and I was the one who actually reverted these disruptive edits [3]

Here are the things to considers when looking at the history page of the article

• the IP adresses that belong to the actual LTA user are 200.58.82.48 and 78.108.170.40 This is the user that kept on violating WP:CRYSTAL by adding three parameters that shouldn't be in the infobox at this time.
• The IP addresses 70.52.95.30, 76.64.220.153 and 76.65.74.178 are my edits.
• I don't know who are 23.91.233.213 and 190.92.9.46 but it's likely the same person and the edits clearly aren't from the LTA user nor are they disruptive

The administrator User:Ivanvector has indiscriminately reverted all edits from IP addresses on this article without even looking at the nature of them. And I seriously doubt Ivanvector has performed a checkuser before blocking the IP addresses. Because if he did, he would have seen that I'm not the same person as the LTA user 200.58.82.48 and 78.108.170.40. A look at the edit history of my three IP addresses I've listed above show that my edits have nothing in common with those of 200.58.82.48 and 78.108.170.40. I also find it very disturbing that removing edits from a disruptive user automatically results of you being lumped with that user without any evidence. I'm requesting for a serious review of this block and feel free to perform a checkuser to see that I'm not the person as 200.58.82.48 and 78.108.170.40. 76.65.74.178 (talk) 19:07, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Checkusers do not act on the request of a user, see WP:CHECKME. If you aren't the disruptive user, please request account via WP:ACC so you are no longer lumped together with other users. 331dot (talk) 20:42, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@331dot: I made a mistake on this one. I have unblocked. IP: my apologies, I clicked a button that I shouldn't have. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 22:51, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

---