User talk:96.32.129.220

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:56, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Interstate 75, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. W4chris (talk) 20:05, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit Wikipedia too, under the name Kubigula. Wikipedia is an all-volunteer operation, and I'm one of the many volunteers here who help review edits. Everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, but I noticed that one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to JFC with this edit, seemed to be unconstructive. I have reverted it for now, and ask that in the future you please use the sandbox for test edits, not encyclopedia articles. It also helps to provide an informative edit summary so that other editors like me have a brief description of your change to Wikipedia. If you have questions, you might want to take a look at this tutorial. Also, feel free to ask me questions on my talk page. Kubigula (talk) 04:23, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:31, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chicago Midway International Airport, you may be blocked from editing. HkCaGu (talk) 16:04, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 2011 Qantas trade union disputes with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ScottyBerg (talk) 17:40, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page 2007 Georgia Bulldogs football team has been reverted.
Your edit here to 2007 Georgia Bulldogs football team was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pfs6LNk7Po) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:46, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Georgia Bulldogs football. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.--Cúchullain ^t/c 21:42, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:48, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

You are now engaged in edit warring across several articles. Please do not continue to disregard these warnings; if you continue even one more time, you will be reported for edit warring and blocked from editing.Cúchullain ^t/c 23:07, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Georgia Bulldogs football to-do list

BTW, if you're looking for something constructive to do for Georgia Bulldogs football-related items, the year-by-year Georgia football records are woefully incomplete and desperately need work. Someone started building these articles and stopped in the middle, and left them as a woeful mess. See for instance, Georgia Bulldogs football under Vince Dooley, and compare that to Florida Gators football, 1950–1959. The Florida Gators year-by-year articles are still a work in progress, but you can see the potential for these articles when properly formatted and pursued to completion. I've wanted to work on the Bulldogs year-by-year articles, but with my current CFB to-do list, I may get to work on these sometime in 2013. Someone also needs to create a "Georgia Bulldogs football navbox"; Georgia is one of the few major programs that does not have a football program navbox of its own. Please see "Template:Florida Gators football navbox" for an example. These team navboxes should be appear at the bottom of the main team article, the year-by-year records articles, and the rivalry game articles. If you have any questions, ask. The Georgia football program has been largely neglected on Wikipedia because no long-term editor has yet taken an interest in it. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 14:04, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rivalry games

Please wait until there is actually consensus before asserting there is consensus to remove the rivalry records. The fact that you've had to alter so many articles is good evidence that the consensus is actually against you. —Ute in DC (talk) 00:53, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just leave all articles at their status quo. Let College football project contributors comment for a week or so before you take any action. A week is required to truly gather consensus. Once we have a consensus, then we'll make sure all the articles are uniform. I'll gladly help you restore the series record to "Florida vs. Georgia Football Classic". —Ute in DC (talk) 01:37, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The thing the looks horrible about that section is Florida's colors. The clash with the simple red/white and the blue/orange is nauseating. Anyway, just leave all the articles as they are. Continue to comment on the college football project talk page and hopefully a decision will be reached. —Ute in DC (talk) 01:49, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You continue to remove this information before consensus has been established. Please stop immediately, or I will request that your IP address be blocked. —Ute in DC (talk) 03:34, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Backyard Brawl shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. —Ute in DC (talk) 07:01, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Peace Pipe (college football) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 07:26, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing, including edit warring on numerous articles, and indicating quite clearly that you have no intention at all of working via consensus. Wikipedia does not work by individual editors stubbornly insisting on having their way irrespective of the opinions of others. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:18, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.