User talk:Aaron Brenneman/Archives/10

I will not be performing deletions, restorations, protections, unprotections, blocking, or unblocking at this time.
Aaron Brenneman (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log)

* * * * * * * * *

Osipov dab

Yeah right, this is what you've just done to one of my dab pages by posting it for deletion. KNewman 11:17, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Allegory of the Cave Wikipage

I believe it's ready to go into the "real" wikipedia! Onedyingwish 18:32, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sev Wide Web

What was your criteria for saying it's not notable? Admiral Memo 21:48, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since I haven't heard back in almost a week, I'm getting rid of the thing. Admiral Memo 00:36, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How to "smarten up and trot out" WP:PORNBIO?

You wrote that this proposed guideline is too long in limbo. What is the procedure for testing it for being worthy of becoming a real guideline? AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 16:03, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia talk:Notability (pornographic actors)#Ready to become a notability criteria guideline. AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 16:45, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks (even if you opposed)

Thanks for your input in my RfA, which passed on October 17, 2006 with a tally of 53/6/0. A word of constructive criticism always helps a person more than a person of support, and your constructive criticism on my RfA helped me realize my shortcomings and how I should improve on them. I will strive to correct such missteps and answer your concerns voiced on my RfA. With humility, ²¹⁰physicq (c) 02:13, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help

Thanks for your help, but I don't think I'm sticking around. In my short time here it has become pretty obvious to me that this is not a positive atmosphere, nor a serious project. Editing Wikipedia and seeing the attitudes of it's members (yourself exempted) has really been an eye opener... I certainly don't have the positive view of it I used to have.

It is pretty disheartening that something which seems to, in the ideal, be such a good idea in practice is not. I wish you luck in dealing with the attitudes here. Urek 15:03, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is pretty disheartening that something which seems to, in the ideal, be such a good idea in practice is not. That's kind of like Communism, isn't it? Great in theory; bad in practice. Admiral Memo 03:08, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Allegory of the Cave Wikipage

How do I get this into the "real" wikipedia? Thanks! Onedyingwish 22:18, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hey, Aaron, just caught your kind note on my user talk page from July. I have a quick couple questions about how/whether to move forward with that AYP piece you took out of view. Is this the proper place to discuss?O. Pen Sauce 21:04, 4 November 2006 (UTC) PS - I'm not at all peeved you moved it out of view (in spite of my defense). I do understand. :)[reply]

Help

Can you please help me by reviewing my article HSV Senator Signature it would help me alot.Senators 07:09, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedster (comics)

Hi. Sorry to bother you, but it looks we might have an edit war at speedster (comics) between myself and Ace Class Shadow. If you could chime in with your opinion on that article’s talk page, so that we can achieve some sort of consensus, it would be appreciated. Thanks. Nightscream 10:30, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffrey T. Capo

I have left a statement on the AFD for the article to keep it from deletion. If there is anything else I should add, please let me know. Thanks. JeffCapo 21:50, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation?

Hi there! I seem to have stepped into an old grudge between two long-standing editors, and it seems some outside mediation would be useful. Would you be willing to help? Thanks. (Radiant) 17:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P-P-P-Powerbook on deletion review

An editor has asked for a deletion review of P-P-P-Powerbook. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. --Czj 08:13, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi nice to meet you I'm Pediaguy16.--Pediaguy16 00:39, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bot

I believe that we should have a bot to welcome the new user accounts for it is very tideus work for people like me that welcome this new users to wikipedia. If this would be possible please contact me on my user page.--The Dwarf_King 14:21, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

The article Black, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring cleanup.

If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Wikipedia's quality standards. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the article's talk page.
You have been left this message by PocKleanBot, an automated process that notifies editors that articles to which they may have contributed on more than one occasion in the past now need cleanup. If you have any comments or object to this message being left, please leave a message on PocKleanBot's talk page.