User talk:Abhiran

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Welcome!

Hello, Abhiran, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Darylgolden^(talk) Ping when replying 13:48, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Abhiran, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Darylgolden^(talk) Ping when replying 13:49, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Yaganti a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Meters (talk) 06:54, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The new name seems to make sense. Are there any English sources that refer to it by that name? Since you have already created an article at the new target now we will have to get an admin to move the article if you can show the new name makes sense. Meters (talk) 06:57, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article titles

I think you may need to slow down a bit with your article renamings. For example, you moved Varma (Surname) and Mohyal Brahmins incorrectly and it just creates more work for other people. - Sitush (talk) 17:38, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely Sitush Actually one of my friend asked me to change mohyal to Mohyal Brahmins I've gone through the article and then changed it.If I did any mistake I'm extremely sorry. Varma is not a name it's a surname so I changed it.Abhiran (talk) to Sitush (talk)

I understand but "Surname" should be "surname" and "Brahmins" should be "Brahmin" - just the way we do things. - Sitush (talk) 21:11, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Sitush from next time onwards if I want to move or change names I'll inform you.Abhiran (talk) to Sitush (talk)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into List of Brahmin dynasties and states. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:47, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Diannaa from next time when ever i copy any content from wikiarticles i'll include {{copied}} tag. And also If i copy anything and paste i'll intimate you Diannaa. Thank You! Abhiran (talk) to Diannaa (talk)

I see by your edits to Hindu philosophy that you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please leave a message on my talk page if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:34, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Panjabrao Deshmukh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maharashtrian Brahmin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arni estate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rao. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for modifying my article Pankarvu (talk) 20:37, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

You've been warned about disruptive editing many times but you've consistently removed such warnings and notices as "remove useless content". While you have the right to remove warnings, removing it as such is just another example of your disruptive behavior. Any further disruptive editing you will either be topic banned or your editing privileges completely revoked. If you have trouble understanding policies then you may contact someone like Kautilya3 who also edits in this space. I also note that he has already warned you about discretionary sanctions pertaining to this area, so treat this is a final warning. —SpacemanSpiff 03:23, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Torgal Jagir

Please stop creating rubbish such as Torgal Jagir without providing reliable sources. A large chunk of it was unsourced and this is not considered to be a reliable source per discussion at WP:RSN - it is self-published. I am sure you have been told this some time in the past. - Sitush (talk) 03:45, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And this edit, elsewhere, is one of many examples of you massively misrepresenting what the sources say. I know it was some months ago but you're still doing it now. - Sitush (talk) 09:32, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your refs

Dear Abhiran, I'm concerned that the sources you are using are very old, and very unreliable. As a veteran Wikipedian myself, let me offer you some sincere advice. If you're looking to find a citation for some statement, use Google Advanced Book search and in the "publisher" window there type: "university press." In the time window there, restrict yourself to sources that are no more than 55 years old, ie confined to the period 1962 to 2017. If you don't find a source in your search using these restrictions, then remove your statement. Otherwise, I fear you will end up in needless controversy. All the best, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 15:58, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes

If you are going to add infoboxes by copy/pasting, you need to fix them This one suggests that the article includes information from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica. I've just spent far too long trying to find the EB entry and it does not appear to exist. - Sitush (talk) 08:43, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop it, please

You can't do this sort of thing without providing a reliable source. I am finding instances of you adding unsupported caste claims (always Brahmin) at numerous articles over a long period of time - it is not acceptable. Please remember WP:V. - Sitush (talk) 07:56, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Akshobhya Tirtha moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Akshobhya Tirtha, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. — Insert CleverPhrase Here 04:42, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Akshobhya Tirtha) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Akshobhya Tirtha, Abhiran!

Wikipedia editor Insertcleverphrasehere just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Needs additional references for verification.

To reply, leave a comment on Insertcleverphrasehere's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

— Insert CleverPhrase Here 04:54, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Pv.abhinav (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —SpacemanSpiff 09:48, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abhiran (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please pardon me i don't have any idea on why I've been blocked i don't know who User:Pv.abhinav is.One of my friend is relative of Article:P. V. Vanaja Bai he was redirecting from some names to this name.I don't have any idea on why I've been blocked please pardon me. From next time onwards I won't give my Wikipedia credentials to him for editing of articles. I'm extremely sorry pardon me

Decline reason:

Sorry, we do not unblock compromised accounts. Especially deliberately compromised accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 16:23, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

Please don't take us for fools, you've already been asked to look at WP:SO through an unblock request from one of your many earlier socks. You are just wasting our time here with this boatload of disruption. —SpacemanSpiff 15:56, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abhiran (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that creating another account is really bad and I apologize for that.I will not do it again and I will not cause any other damage or disruption to Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

Duplicate request, procedural close RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:45, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abhiran (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Atleast please restore all the articles which were created by me. Atleast do this favor,i have spent a lot of time in researching about these articles

Decline reason:

Your articles did not meet our standards for inclusion on Wikipedia. Additionally you have admitted your account was deliberately compromised, and you have socked with multiple accounts. Removing talk page access as this is becoming a waste of time. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:47, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

File:COA darbhanga.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:COA darbhanga.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:11, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]