User talk:Adilswati

March 2016

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Adilswati. Thank you. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 20:47, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 22:36, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adilswati (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

With due respect it is stated that i have been blocked since March due to multiple accounts, but i honestly declare here that i was a naive user to Wikpidia and did not know that multiple accounts are prohibited, it was my honest mistake to create mulitple accounts due to disliking for my certain user names. Similarly, due to my short duration in Wikipedia, i was unaware about the policies of Wikipedia, owing to which i slipped in abiding by the rules of Wikipedia. I will delete all of my other accounts except Adilswati will be in my use and assure you that i will never commit this mistake in future again. I am an avid contributor to Wikipedia and desirous to continue my journey once again with enthusiasm. If you kindly unblock my account, i shall be grateful to you for this act of kindness. Your co-operation in this matter shall be greatly appreciated. Thanks Adilswati (talk) 16:37, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

How interesting to read that you were "a naive user" who did not know about Wikipedia's policy on sockpuppetry, and then to look through your editing history and see you mentioning that policy, and accusing another editor of violating the policy, eight months before you were blocked. That alone would be sufficient grounds for declining the unblock request, but if we add in the fact that your use of multiple accounts sometimes looked like a deliberate attempt to deceive, the fact that you have repeatedly attacked other editors, and the fact that much of your editing is clearly designed to plug a nationalist point of view, and it is clear that unblocking you would not benefit the project. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 18:33, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Eid Mubarak!

آپ کو اور آپ کے گھر والوں کو دل کی اتھاہ گہرائیوں سے عید کی خوشیاں بہت بہت مبارک۔

Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 04:43, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Adilswati. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]