User talk:Adrianaposting

June 2022

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Move Ya Hips, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 04:02, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Xavier Prather (October 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Xavier Prather instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Xavier Prather and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:00, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Adrianaposting! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:00, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Adrianaposting! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:37, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you revert editors, please explain why, in an edit summary. If those edits are vandalism, please say so explicitly, and please place a warning on the user's talk page. You can find templated warnings at Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:41, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. However thank you for helping revert vandals regardless. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:44, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Finnish Wikipedia -article

Why did you revert my edit? --Cheers! Kilaseell - Message me! - 17:11, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

omg so sorry thought it was vandalism. my bad!!! Adrianaposting (talk) 17:12, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it is fine! Everyone makes mistakes. --Cheers! Kilaseell - Message me! - 17:14, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case you wanted to do your bit ✨🙂

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's socialism articles. Did you know there's a WikiProject for editors interested in writing about socialism? If you would like to join, simply click the Join WikiProject button on the WikiProject Socialism page. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the WikiProject Socialism talk page.

We look forward to working with you in the future!

Alpyn (talk) 20:45, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thank you! <3 adriana 💌 21:17, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hi,

You reverted a bunch of edits on airport articles, such as over at Orlando International Airport, and I’m not sure why? A IP user edited the page as a route was resuming and with no edit summary, you undid it. There’s no reason to do it, the IP user was correct in their edit so I’m not sure why this was done.

Thank you! (VenFlyer98 (talk) 21:06, 2 November 2022 (UTC))[reply]

hi,

i reverted those edits because that user was getting rid of large portions of content and refererences, it looked like vandalism to me. i apologize if that wasn't the case! adriana 💌 21:14, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, those edits were fine, they were removing information that had to be removed for an airport article. Just keep in mind when reverting that not every edit that removes content is negative. Especially in the context of airport pages. Thanks for understanding! VenFlyer98 (talk) 03:34, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Holyrood Park

You have reverted a couple of my edits on the Salisbury Crags section . 1. The addition to the simple and proper English language, Salisbury Crags, makes the heading over long. More pertinently, it ignores Wikipedia Manual of Style on Headings. 2. The comment that "however in 1128, the cliffs were described in a charter under an older Gaelic name, Creag nam Marbh" is incorrect. Scottish charters of the time were written in Latin not Gaelic. The name in the charter (see "Early Scottish charters prior to A.D. 1153) is "Craggenemarf" or "Craggenmarf" probably of British origin and which probably refers to Arthurs Seat rather than Salisbury Crags - see G.W.S. Barrow in Book of the Old Edinburgh Club 1959 and Stuart Harris in The Place Names of Edinburgh.82.28.236.130 (talk) 15:10, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The burden of verifiability

Hi Adrianaposting, when restoring content that has been challenged by other users, according to the verifiability policy, please make sure to provide the requested citations. I'll restore 49.33.193.49's edits for now, but you'd be welcome to undo mine when adding citations of reliable sources in the process. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:41, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Xavier Prather

Hello, Adrianaposting. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Xavier Prather, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:03, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Xavier Prather

Hello, Adrianaposting. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Xavier Prather".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:28, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]