User talk:AeroPsico

Welcome

Hello, AeroPsico! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! 65.94.45.160 (talk) 05:24, 20 April 2011 (UTC) Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

December 2010

Please stop editing! Now. Materialscientist (talk) 10:40, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Please explain why do you add Acronyms and abbreviations in avionics to any possible article. Materialscientist (talk) 10:42, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Because is relationated with avionics and it is an acronym or abbreviation used in avionics. You can see Acronyms and abbreviations in avionics

What you were doing: (i) compiled a long list of topic (ii) adding a link to that list to every article from the list. You are welcome to convince me that I am wrong, but for now, I do suggest you stop it. The reasons are - (i) virtually any title can be abbreviated, (ii) thousands of topics can be said "related to avionic" because this topic is so broad, (iii) thus your idea does look like spam - adding that Acronyms and abbreviations in avionics list does not improve the article - all concepts of primary importance are already linked in the body, and "see also" must be brief. Materialscientist (talk) 10:50, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Stalker (Stalking)

It is generally inappropriate to copy and paste a large amount of content from one article to another as you did by creating Stalker (Stalking) by copying from Stalking. The material seems appropriate in that article and it is not so long as to require splitting. If you have improvements to that content, please add them to the stalking article rather than duplicating content unnecessarily. older ≠ wiser 15:19, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Do not move pages by copying and pasting the content as that disrupts the edit history which is necessary to maintain under Wikipedia Terms of Use. If you are unable to move a page, you can request a move by following the instructions at WP:RM. older ≠ wiser 13:56, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

"Architecture" in English

Hello, AeroPsico --

The word "architecture" in English is not the same as it is in Spanish or other Romance languages. In those other languages it has a much broader meaning, but in English it only refers to the design and construction of buildings. In English there is no "architecture of airplanes" or "airplane architecture"; this is aeronautical/aerospace engineering.

With that in mind, I've nominated both of the categories aircraft arquitecture and aircraft architecture for deletion (the links are the the deletion discussions). Please add your thoughts there. --Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû _(blah?) 19:41, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Category:Aerobatics aircrafts

Can you please stop adding aircraft to the Category:Aerobatics aircrafts, it is misspelled and aircrafts is not used in English in this context, the plural of aircraft is aircraft. I have raised the issue at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft#Category:Aerobatics aircrafts to see if the correctly spelled category is needed. Your comments welcome but appreciate you stop adding anything to this category until it is discussed. Thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 15:21, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Apollo Hoax in Popular Culture

An article that pertains to Wikiproject: Human Spaceflight; Apollo hoax in popular culture, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apollo hoax in popular culture (2nd nomination). Thank you. Senior Trend (talk) 05:11, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Neil Williams (pilot)

I just thought I'd let you know that I saw your article Neil Williams (pilot) in the New Articles list-- It would be great if you could also improve the related article Sándor Katona. Jipinghe (talk) 18:27, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Controversy Mario Luna

Hi! Could you check this? Controversy of Mario Luna Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ojoloco (talk • contribs) 13:11, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Competition aerobatics

Hello AeroPsico —

I see that you added judging criteria for CIVA or a particular national aerobatic club to the article Competition aerobatics. I sincerely believe that this content has no place here. It's tangential to and distracting from the essence of the piece. Moreover, different judging rules apply to different clubs. (BAeA differs from IAC, which differs from CIVA, for example.) What applies in Spain may have no parallel in Canada.

Before reverting this, I wanted to ask you to reconsider and remove this material yourself.

I'd be happy to talk further with you about this; please leave a note here; I'll see and respond to it. Regards and thanks, Jim Ward ^{(talk·stalk)} 16:25, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Mario Luna

Please read WP:BLP. Any contentious material must be very reliably sourced. That does not include blogs, personal websites, etc. I've edited the article to remove a copyvio link to YouTube and badly referenced material about a controversy. Please be more careful in the future. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 16:58, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Magic Bullets (book)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Magic Bullets (book), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Autarch (talk) 17:38, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Precision approach radar

Hello AeroPsico, I saw that you contributed to the article, so maybe you can answer my question. Can the term "Precision approach radar" be applied to a device mounted on an aircraft, or is it exclusive for ground-based equipment? In other words, can I call a radar on an airplane "Precision approach radar"? Setreset (talk) 08:37, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Political adviser

Hello AeroPsico. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Political adviser, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: no need for deletion: you can simply create your article on top of the redirect. That will be better, because it preserves the history. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 20:03, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Public bank, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages VEB and State (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)