User talk:Aghorahu

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Aghorahu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Aghorahu, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 16:06, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello, I'm Eostrix. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Pilani have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 16:07, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. https://digiroads.in Cabayi (talk) 17:09, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DigiRoads (November 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SK2242 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DigiRoads and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:DigiRoads, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SK2242 (talk) 06:37, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aghorahu! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SK2242 (talk) 06:37, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that they dont have sufficient coverage, you can search yourself on google about them. Aghorahu (talk) 10:16, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Hello Aghorahu. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:DigiRoads, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Aghorahu. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Aghorahu|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. SK2242 (talk) 06:38, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No i dont have any financial stake in digiroads. I wrote about it because digiroads is a well known company in Pilani. The founders are from pilani and they are doing good for the nearby small businesses in terms of enhancing their digital reach and customers at local level. If you still think that its wrong to promote good work done by the people at wikipedia then you are allowed to delete the page. I was just doing them a favor for their good services in Pilani. Infact my father owns a small shop and we were facing existential crisis dueto ongoing pandemic. But due to their marketing efforts, we are surviving even in this pandemic. Aghorahu (talk) 10:12, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i have a financial stake but not in their company but in my own shop which is still serving the local people due to their good work. I edited their information so that they can get the recognition they deserved for their services. Aghorahu (talk) 10:14, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Abbottabad, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Idell (talk) 11:22, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing Idell. I have more than 10 sources for the edit in abbottabad. I wrote about the osama bin laden incident which actually happened in this city of pakistan. If you insist, i can provide more than 100 reliable sources for my edit on abbottabad page. However, seems like you don't know about that incident. Let me explain you. Osama bin laden was hiding in Pakistan from a long time. American forces and intelligence agencies confirmed this report and even they raided the compound of osama bin laden in abbottabad. Government of Pakistan was secretly hiding the most wanted terrorist of the world. And still you says that the information was not accurate. Let me tell you that it was not a hoax. It was a preplanned strategy of Pakistan government to hide the most wanted criminal of earth. Just give a reply and i will give you more than 100 references for the same. Aghorahu (talk) 16:17, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DigiRoads (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pahunkat was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Refs 1-8 are primary sources by the company itself, so don't establish notability. Ref 9 is a link to the university's homepage, which as far as I can see does not say anything about the company. Refs 10-11 are google/google map listings which don't establish notability. WP:CORPDEPTH may be useful.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DigiRoads and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:DigiRoads, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pahunkat (talk) 21:00, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello, Aghorahu. This is your user talk page; the purpose of this page is for notification and communication with other Wikipedia editors. It is not a workspace for articles in progress or promotional content. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or create new articles. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 02:34, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:DigiRoads

Hello, Aghorahu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:DigiRoads, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:DigiRoads

Hello, Aghorahu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "DigiRoads".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:26, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]