User talk:Alamo NM

Blanking

While blanking is fine (WP:BLANK), please avoid making attacks against editors in edit summaries (WP:SUMMARYNO). The messages you received were part of standard procedures. Thank you, —Paleo Neonate – 19:53, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies. I absolutely didn't get bored to death with certain Wikipedia editors who didn't have a King Complex, and it wasn't at all very cleansing to just delete them from my life — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alamo NM (talk • contribs)

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sunspot, New Mexico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AURA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:18, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 4)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: not a draft article no need to submit

Theroadislong (talk) 19:27, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alamo NM! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 19:27, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Alamo NM/sandbox

Hello, Alamo NM. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:00, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Valentín Martínez Pillet

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Valentín Martínez Pillet, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CUPIDICAE💕 01:06, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please rewrite the article in draft so that it complies with our guidelines on Wikipedia:NPOV, and then submit for review. Deb (talk) 12:08, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can I get access to the final version that was posted before deletion, so I can work on it? Alamo NM (talk) 19:41, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Valentín Martínez Pillet has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Valentín Martínez Pillet. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:05, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Alamo NM. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Valentín Martínez Pillet, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:06, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Thanks for for the notice. I confirm I do not have a conflict with the person on this page. I am retired, living in Alamogordo, and have no history with this person or their employer. My interests lie in Astronomy in the southwest USA, and are purely for my own enjoyment of this topic. Do I need to include this information on that page, or this answer sufficient? Alamo NM (talk) 21:17, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's okay. Just take care how you write - conform to Wikipedia:NPOV and try to stop the article looking like a CV. Deb (talk) 21:47, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Valentín Pillet (May 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gusfriend were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All of the references are primary sources. Google Scholar and YouTube and not suitable and the other references are from the NSO.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Valentín Pillet and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Valentín Pillet, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 13:53, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Valentín Martínez Pillet (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mu301 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

To establish notability there needs to be WP:SIGCOV in reliable WP:SECONDARY sources. The list of references here is overly reliant on the person's employer. In plain English has this person been profiled in newspapers? have they received awards for their work from a scientific society? have books mentioned their work? The article needs to demonstrate that they are obviously notable by citing sources that are independent from the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Valentín Martínez Pillet and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Valentín Martínez Pillet, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

mikeu ^talk 22:17, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello, I'm Mr.weedle. I noticed that you made a change to an article, James McAteer, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mr.weedle (talk) 03:22, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Valentín Pillet

Hello, Alamo NM. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Valentín Pillet, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:28, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Valentín Martínez Pillet

Hello, Alamo NM. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Valentín Martínez Pillet, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft articles

Hello, Alamo NM,

Please do not create multiple versions of a draft article and submit it to AFC. It's a waste of our reviewer's time to review two similar drafts and our volunteers' time is the most limited resource we have at Wikipedia. Please select one draft to work on and tag the other for speedy deletion.

Ask at the Teahouse for guidance on tagging pages for speedy deletion. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:25, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Valentín Martínez Pillet

Hello, Alamo NM. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Valentín Martínez Pillet".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:19, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

your revert on New Mexico State University page

Please see the talk page. -- Melchior2006 (talk) 18:33, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ElKevbo (talk) 22:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]