User talk:Alan Hardest

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page–my talk page–as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

October 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:15, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Additional reasons include copyright issues and not disclosing that you are being paid despite the requests. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:18, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alan Hardest (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I hereby declare that I have been paid for the articles that I created, but not for all. There are some non-paid articles too. I assure you that I will do the positive contribution in future. In case I do any paid editing, will declare it in advance. I request you kindly unblock me.

Decline reason:

You were asked about this in December last year and again a few days back and did nothing but ignore us and show a wilful disdain for our terms of service and policies. —SpacemanSpiff 00:58, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alan Hardest (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I totally agree with you but I was afraid of being blocked that is why I was hesitating to disclose my paid editing. Now that I have disclosed all the articles which I have been paid for. I would request you to kindly unblock me. Alan Hardest (talk) 18:47, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This doesn't address your abuse of multiple accounts. Note, though, at this point it's hard to imagine any statement from you that we could trust enough to unblock. You've shown we can't take you at your work and we can't trust you here on Wikipedia. You are welcome to request another block review, but you'll have to be significantly more convincing. Yamla (talk) 21:47, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alan Hardest (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would ask that you please reconsider my block system. I understand that I did wrong by not declaring paid editing. An unblock will be appreciated and I will only use this one moving forward and will abide by all of Wikipedia's guidelines. In case I do any paid editing, will declare it in advance. Alan Hardest (talk) 16:09, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This seems to just be repeating the paragraph you added below. You subsequently lied about creating those articles, and about using multiple accounts. This is in addition to your previous integrity problems with undisclosed paid editing, even after being prompted multiple times. It does not appear that you can be taken for your word, and requests to make more paid edits seems poorly timed. Kuru (talk) 16:25, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Were do you list the articles you wrote for pay? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:55, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am sharing all the articles (paid and non paid)

Jafar Dehghan (Non Paid)
Parvaneh Massoumi (Non Paid)
Leila Boloukat (Non Paid)
Raheja Productions (Paid)
Raheja Universal (Paid)
Manveer Kumar Baisoya (Non Paid)
Dattaram B Desai (Non Paid)
Namik Paul (actor) (Non Paid)
Manuj Tilakraj Gulati (Non Paid)
Niladri Paul (Paid)
Nivaan Sen (Paid)
Zainulabedin Hamdulay (Paid)
Murali Kumar (Non Paid)
ByHours (Paid)
Kamlesh D. Patel (Non Paid)
Sandeep Sinha (Paid)

I would ask that you please reconsider my block system. I understand that I did wrong by not declaring paid editing. An unblock will be appreciated and I will only use this one moving forward and will abide by all of Wikipedia's guidelines. In case I do any paid editing, will declare it in advance. Alan Hardest (talk) 19:14, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The other problem that has since been discoverage is your use of multiple accounts. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:48, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Before any unblock is granted, I want to see a plausible and rational explanation behind your steady denial about PAID/COI editing, till you ended up being blocked and a complete list of the articles that you were paid to create and/or edit in any manner.Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 08:21, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Alan:Did you miss declaring about the following articles:--

Regards:)Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 06:21, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Winged Blades of Godric, These articles have not been created by me. This was the only account that I had been using. Alan Hardest (talk) 17:57, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

— Berean Hunter (talk) 14:22, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for running this User:Berean Hunter Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:48, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kadambari Jethwani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kadambari Jethwani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kadambari Jethwani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jupitus Smart 13:36, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]