User talk:Alivebills

Welcome!

Hello, Alivebills, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Longhair\^talk 03:38, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:07, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Alivebills (talk) 20:12, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strasbourg attack

I've taken this off the article talk page, but WP operates in a more cautious way than news sources typically do. One of our core policies is WP:V. The early indicators are that the Strasbourg attack is probably/almost certainly going to have an Islamist dimension, but the reader can come to that conclusion as easily as we can as to what this incident may well be/probably is. We state only what is certain and we attribute it (ie this police official/justice minister said the incident was being treated as "insert quote").

I've been involved in several of these big "breaking stories" - 4 times out of 5 everybody's "first guess", turned out to be wholly or largely true - the fifth time wholly wrong. Caution, even if it seems pedantic sometimes, is no bad thing overall. Pincrete (talk) 12:13, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is why we don't add the names of suspects to articles. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:50, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We must be up-to-date and complete with our info. No censorship. :) Alivebills (talk) 20:54, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Edelseider (talk) 14:07, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Alivebills. You've been warned per the outcome of the edit warring complaint about 2018 Strasbourg attack. If you revert the article again you may be blocked, unless you have received a prior consensus for your change on the article talk page. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:10, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of DisuseKid (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:26, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]