User talk:Alixapixle8

Chat with me here, I may not respond, but I will in like 8 days, If not, I may be on vacation. Here are some rules about chatting on my wall, these rules do not apply to admin's though. But if your not an admin, please read these rules.

1. Don't chat spam to me, I will block you, or report you.

2. I am NOT an admin, don't chat me for help with your account, but if I ever do become an admin, I will change this rule, but for now, I cannot help you I am sorry.

3. Feel free to request help with articles, I would feel honoured to help you with articles, I can help with how to upload a file, to how to add an image on a page, and how to create an infobox. ect.

Thank you!

Ways to improve Konrad II, Count of Everstein

Hello, Alixapixle8,

Thank you for creating Konrad II, Count of Everstein.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

If all we have is genealogical info, the subject may not be notable.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mccapra}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mccapra (talk) 06:52, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Konrad II, Count of Everstein moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Konrad II, Count of Everstein, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:15, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I will look into it -Alixapixle8

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Counts of Everstein

A tag has been placed on Category:Counts of Everstein requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:20, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mafalda González de Lara moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mafalda González de Lara, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:12, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Konrad II, Count of Everstein (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

geni.com is not a reliable source as user generated content - if the pages have any reliable sources use them directly

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Konrad II, Count of Everstein and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Konrad II, Count of Everstein, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 09:54, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alixapixle8! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 09:54, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mafalda González de Lara

Hello, Alixapixle8. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mafalda González de Lara, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mafalda González de Lara

Hello, Alixapixle8. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mafalda González de Lara".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Eternal Shadow Talk 17:58, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Konrad II, Count of Everstein

Hello, Alixapixle8. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Konrad II, Count of Everstein, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:04, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

PICKLEDICAE🥒 12:55, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

What edits? Signed, (talk) 02:29, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] They're blocked. If you're trying to be ironic, that's hard to do in this medium. . Acroterion (talk) 02:31, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was obviously light-hearted, and I sent the goofy message before they were blocked. Signed, (talk) 02:36, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't feed the trolls - just warn them. Trying to be funny doesn't work very well in that context. Acroterion (talk) 02:38, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was just blinded by patriotism for my party. Signed, (talk) 02:39, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Plus you cant lie, it was kind of funny. Signed, (talk) 02:40, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was indistinguishable from trolling. Acroterion (talk) 03:01, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry T.T Signed, (talk) 03:04, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]