User talk:AmandaNP/Archives/2013/December
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Poop patrol
No longer maintaining. See below. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Hi DQ, any chance of a poop patrol run in time for this weekend? ϢereSpielChequers 10:30, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Welcome back! ϢereSpielChequers 21:59, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
|
The Signpost: 04 December 2013
- Traffic report: Kennedy shot Who
- Recent research: Reciprocity and reputation motivate contributions to Wikipedia; indigenous knowledge and "cultural imperialism"; how PR people see Wikipedia
- Discussion report: Musical scores, diversity conference, Module:Convert, and more
- WikiProject report: Electronic Apple Pie
- Featured content: F*&!
The Signpost: 11 December 2013
- Traffic report: Deaths of Mandela, Walker top the list
- In the media: Edward Snowden a "hero"; German Wikipedia court ruling
- News and notes: Wiki Loves Monuments—winners announced
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Wine
- Interview: Wikipedia's first Featured Article centurion
- Featured content: Viewer discretion advised
- Technology report: MediaWiki 1.22 released
Troll sock series
Hi DeltaQuad, I suppose you are aware of the series of troll socks that have been out for User:Werieth recently, starting with Request Denied Forever (talk · contribs), then Arnhem 96 (talk · contribs) and Formal Appointee Number 6 (talk · contribs). When you blocked the first of this series the other day [1], you said there was a "relation to another account (CU based)". Does that mean you have CU evidence linking the troll socks to a specific, currently active sockmaster account? I'm asking because, in that case, given the persistence of the sockpuppeting and block evasion as well as the impression of a wiki-hounding agenda, it might be time to impose sanctions on the sockmaster account too, don't you think? Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:29, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- We can add On the top and under the line (talk · contribs) to the list. Can we get a checkuser done to block any other sleepers and the underlying IP address(es)? Werieth (talk) 01:12, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- I don't know who the actual sockmaster is (as I think these aren't all the accounts) and that is why there has been no particular action against them. I used my administrative discretion at the time to block whoever the first account was, there was no checkuser basis at that time. That said, here is the active list of accounts:
Confirmed:
- Arnhem 96 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Rabbit Massacre (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Request Denied In Perpetuity (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Request Denied Forever (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Confirmed,
Likely to the above:
- On the top and under the line (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Rush the stage (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Formal Appointee Number 6 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- At this time, a IP block does not appear it will be efficient. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 13:23, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Having looked at several of those accounts myself, my thoughts on these accounts are in line with yours, DQ. —DoRD (talk) 15:45, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- he is back HTI 483 (talk · contribs), can we please start rev deling the harassment? Werieth (talk) 17:25, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Blocked an additional account. And the Revision Delete policy does not allow for deleting the content. You may wish to request and edit filter. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 17:43, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Wouldnt G2 or G3 which are often applied to disruptive/harassing vandals apply? Werieth (talk) 17:49, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Attempting to make a case for "Wereith = Betacommand" is neither grossly degrading/insulting/offensive (RD2) nor purely disruptive (RD3). It may very well be a wrong conclusion, and using socks to argue the case is definitely going about it the wrong way, but I agree with DQ that it doesn't fit within the limited confines of what we're permitted to revision delete. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:26, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Is there any merit to the allegation? — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 01:02, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- This is not the place, nor will I entertain the merit of something like this from someone's very obvious sock. They can come out of the closet, then, I will consider looking at it. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 02:30, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- Vector Informal (talk · contribs) is another sock. Werieth (talk) 16:59, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed:
- Guy Norcon (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- HTI 483 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Vector Informal (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 18:07, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- For some reason the sockpuppeteer is now posting to my talk page[2][3] despite my notable lack of prior interactions[4][5] It appears that this edit[6] set him off. Before I was ignoring his claims because he is a spammer and sockpuppeteer. Now I am ignoring them because he is a moron who is too dimwitted to tell the difference between fixing a bot-supplied link and being involved. --Guy Macon (talk) 20:14, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
File:WikiJaguar Ribbon Small.png
File:WikiJaguar Ribbon Small.png, which had previously been listed at WP:RIB seems to have been edited per CSD G7 (Single author request deletion). Is there any more information available about this deletion before I begin the Undeletion process? Achowat (talk) 07:04, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Not that I know of. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 13:28, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- I'm a little new at getting things to be no longer deleted. Would you say this (a sole author requests deletion of a useful image) is more the purview of WP:DRV or WP:UND? Achowat (talk) 14:24, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Definitely a WP:UND, but I don't see any issue with me undeleting it here if you wish. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 17:15, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- If you don't mind, it'll save me the time. Thanks! Achowat (talk) 09:12, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- Definitely a WP:UND, but I don't see any issue with me undeleting it here if you wish. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 17:15, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- I'm a little new at getting things to be no longer deleted. Would you say this (a sole author requests deletion of a useful image) is more the purview of WP:DRV or WP:UND? Achowat (talk) 14:24, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 December 2013
- WikiProject report: Babel Series: Tunisia on the French Wikipedia
- Traffic report: Hopper to the top
- Discussion report: Usernames, template data and documentation, Main page, and more
- News and notes: Nine new arbitrators announced
- Featured content: Triangulum, the most boring constellation in the universe
- Technology report: Introducing the GLAMWikiToolset
Curiosity
Out of curiosity, why were the accounts on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Stern_review banned? I had been watching one and their edits seemed constructive, as did many of the other socks. Just curious. EvergreenFir (talk) 02:37, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- They were indefinitely blocked. It was due to the violation of several sections of the sockpuppetry policy. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 17:20, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Also note that based on the ANI discussion it was apparent that some of the articles created contained incorrect information. It was disruption on a very wide scale.--Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 17:50, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Yo Ho Ho
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a0/Stonehenge_%28sun%29.jpg/150px-Stonehenge_%28sun%29.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a7/Two_men_on_a_large_formation_or_terrace._TA2648.jpg/93px-Two_men_on_a_large_formation_or_terrace._TA2648.jpg)
ϢereSpielChequers is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec13}} to your friends' talk pages.
Merry Christmas! :-)
Merry Yuletides to you! (And a happy new year!)
~TheGeneralUser (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Hi DeltaQuad, Wishing you a very Happy and Wonderful Merry Christmas! Hope you are having a great time with family and friends :-) Best wishes. ~TheGeneralUser (talk) 22:39, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 December 2013
- Recent research: Cross-language editors, election predictions, vandalism experiments
- Featured content: Drunken birds and treasonous kings
- Discussion report: Draft namespace, VisualEditor meetings
- WikiProject report: More Great WikiProject Logos
- News and notes: IEG round 2 funding rewards diverse ambitions
- Technology report: OAuth: future of user designed tools
Hello, DeltaQuad. Like I stated in the above linked investigation with regard to Picker78 admitting only after he is caught that he is Picker78, see here. He taunts like that all time. This is one of the most persistent, mind-boggling sockpuppets (mind-boggling because of the sheer trivial matters he focuses on) that I have ever seen. Is it okay to run a check on his Promiscuous man account now for WP:Sleepers?
I also just stated the same thing at Rschen7754's talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 10:16, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- Even through NativeForeigner just ran the check yesterday, I ran it again, and there was nothing to lead me to more socks. That said, there is definitely room for him to move around and be hiding one. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 17:53, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, like I stated here, thank you. Flyer22 (talk) 18:07, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for checking on the Tennisskatinggymnasticsfan socks. I was wrong once making an assumption on another editor and I try to make sure before proceeding now, but we were beginning to feel like we were caught in a tornado with all these new editors edit warring on the same subject. I know you have a lot on your plate in handling these things (and I'm sure we'll see more from him) but I really appreciate your time and effort. Have a great New Years. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:24, 29 December 2013 (UTC)