User talk:Amar Singh Okk

August 2019

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ravidas have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 01:58, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you?

Shri Guru ravidass ji i Amar Singh Okk (talk) 01:58, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ravidas. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. That much change to the content requires discussion at talk. And do not add "Shri" and "Ji" honorifics since Wikipedia is neutral Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:43, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ravidas, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 15:42, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Amar Singh Okk, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Amar Singh Okk! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ravidas. CLCStudent (talk) 00:00, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. caknuck _° needs to be running more often 05:52, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ravidas, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:42, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ravidas. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:39, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 18:16, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you keep making the same edits that got you blocked in the first place, you will be getting blocks for longer periods of time, up to indefinite time. Why not discuss your proposed changes (with proper references), in the article's Talk Page instead? -- Alexf^(talk) 10:20, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 4 days for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Ravidas. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 10:21, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Ravidas. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Alexf^(talk) 20:41, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ravidas. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:41, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are hereby informed that threats are not allowed. This edit seems to be a threat to Wikipedia editors. -- Alexf^(talk) 09:52, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 09:54, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amar Singh Okk. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Cabayi (talk) 08:01, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]