User talk:Amr247rn

We cannot accept copypasted materials, as they're in violation of all applicable laws for plagiarism.

Hello! This is my very first submission and I am working hard to navigate the process. I copied the article from my own word document because I found the edit page confusing. After I had done that I found the visual editing page. This is all original work, I just used a format that I was more comfortable with.

Amr247rn, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Amr247rn! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Teahouse. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 14:05, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Constantine Mavroudis (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devopam was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please avoid repeated references to establish a fact. Kindly limit it to 2-3 most relevant ones only. Article is grossly WP:UNDERLINKING . Potential very good article, look forward to the changes done soon. There are few sections with no reference at all (education in Personal Life) that will need referencing as well.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Constantine Mavroudis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devopam (talk) 12:20, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Constantine Mavroudis (July 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see WP:42. Definitely an improvement on last submission though!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Constantine Mavroudis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 10:21, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Constantine Mavroudis (January 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SeraphWiki was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please address the issues raised by previous reviewers before resubmitting - excessive citation does not establish notability, and his "most noteworthy contributions" can not be cited to primary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Constantine Mavroudis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Constantine Mavroudis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SeraphWiki (talk) 04:24, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Draft:Constantine Mavroudis

Tips:

Publications by Dr Mavroudis are secondary sources. They do not provide an outsider view of the article subject.
A handful of independent -- not primary and not secondary -- sources are required for the draft to pass.
Sources need to speak of Dr Mavroudis himself rather than his work.
2-3 paragraphs are a sufficient size.
Brightly lit (rather than dark) portrait photos look better.

FYI I moved your sources to a separate section, called 'Publications'.

--Gryllida (talk) 06:12, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Long lists are difficult to read. Please minimise their usage in the article, and adjust their formatting. --Gryllida (talk) 06:14, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Constantine Mavroudis (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Constantine Mavroudis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Constantine Mavroudis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:30, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Constantine Mavroudis has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Constantine Mavroudis. Thanks! Waggie (talk) 07:15, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Constantine Mavroudis (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RoySmith were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Constantine Mavroudis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Constantine Mavroudis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 17:44, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]