User talk:Andreabee12
Feel free to talk to me on the page below. I don't bite.
Hey Andrea! It's Gillian! So cool to be one step closer to being a Wiki Contributor! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gilliark (talk • contribs) 19:14, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Message from... Haruki!
[edit]Hi Andrea! It's Haruki! I just made an entire section for myself! Decafespresso (talk) 22:57, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Andreabee12, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Andreabee12! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! I JethroBT (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:26, 10 September 2014 (UTC) |
Welcome
[edit]Hi, Andrea! Thanks for your message on my Talk page and I hope your first edits went well. Welcome to Wikipedia! Amy E Hughes (talk) 14:51, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Happy Monday
[edit]Happy Monday morning! Excited to start the week Jsattler07 (talk) 15:07, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Bibliography
[edit]Hi, Andreabee12 -- thanks for posting your bibliography. Your sources look very promising, although I hope you will deepen and diversify your research by consulting books as well (I noticed these are all articles). Since you formatted your bibliography in APA (Wikipedia) style, unfortunately I can't offer you any feedback about your grasp of MLA, which worries me a little, but you will have another chance when compiling a prelim bib for your Wiki project in the spring semester. Of course, I'm available to give you feedback if you want to give it a shot this semester as well, using these or other sources you find! Let me know if you'd like to do that. Amy E Hughes (talk) 14:45, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Peer review
[edit]You seem to have tried to request a peer review at Talk:Regularis Concordia (Winchester) but it is not showing up correctly. See Wikipedia:Peer review/guidelines for instructions. Dudley Miles (talk) 20:38, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Re: Peer Review
[edit]Hey Andrea, I think that you have a really nice start on your article. To get it pas the start/stub status, I think you just need to continue filling out your well-articulated sections. I also really like the visual content that you added and I think that it greatly enhances your article. I think you will also be able to strengthen your article by adding a "References" section. This is the same topic as your classroom presentation, correct? You've demonstrated a wealth of knowledge on the subject and I look forward to reading the final product! LMR0804 (talk) 03:45, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Puppy For You
[edit]I love kittens.....but puppies are better!
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Gilliark (talk • contribs) 04:41, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Preliminary bibliography for spring 2015
[edit]Hi, Andreabee12 -- your prelim bib looks good, although I want and expect you to look at some of the excellent and extensive scholarship on Arthur Miller. All the secondary sources you have now are from newspapers, which (as you know) is a very different kind of writing. Please contact a librarian if you need help locating books and journal articles about your topic. In terms of MLA style, you've got a good grasp of it! Remember, though, that titles of books, newspapers, journals, magazines, etc. need to be formatted in italics. Based on the list you've generated, that's the only error I see. Happy researching! Amy E Hughes (talk) 16:00, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
March 2015
[edit]Hello, I'm BeenAroundAWhile. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Arthur Miller because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Your additions about the A.M. Foundation would be just fine if they were referenced to independent, outside sources. I'm sure you can find some if you look hard enough. Good luck! BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 18:12, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
This is for an educational assignment. Thanks for the tip.
Andreabee12 (talk) 19:36, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Arthur Miller Peer Review
[edit]Hi Andrea, It looks like your page wasn't submitted for peer review after all. If you go to the course page, there's a link under April 15th that will lead you to the page for setting it up. Thanks! Deliirving (talk) 17:32, 9 April 2015 (UTC)