Jump to content

User talk:Andrzej Rybkiewicz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Andrzej Rybkiewicz, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Andrzej Rybkiewicz! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 20 June 2020 (UTC)


June 2020

[edit]

These REFs are not self promotional links. These are links to flights schedules, especially to the flights booking system which is showing the dates of flights, airlines, hours and aircraft type in some cases. These REFs is a proving for charter routes.

You have to undo all your edits and make it back to versions made by me. You are not able to delete the suitable REFs which are proving charter routes.

Filips3 (talk) 12:07, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Filips3 your reference links are pure propaganda. Those sites you are referring doesn't provide plane tickets but holidays packages! Advertising, Self-promotion, soapbox is not allowed on Wikipedia. Please keep our wikipedia garbage free. Thanks

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Katowice Airport, you may be blocked from editing. Ed6767 talk! 16:49, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop deleting REFs

[edit]

Let me explain you that I am not any worker of any of these companies. Please check the sources. Skyscanner does not provide any info about eg. Enter Air routes. As you can see at Itaka or Rainbow schedules, all flights are noted there. Please search e.g. for Katowice - Zakynthos and then it will show you planned routes for future as well as airline operating this route and hours.

@Filips3: You are not using Rainbow as reference, only itaka and tui... plus the links have no info at its ends. You can use opodo for enter air or just fix the enter air section but you are making the whole article about itaka and tui I have been checking before making edits and you adds those links. Is a normal use seo agencies use wikipedia when creating backlinks and Im 100% sure you are doing just that!


There are some rainbow's REFs named "Charter Flights charterflights.r.pl You have to be aware of that all airports in the World are using travel agencies charter flights booking systems to prove charter flights out of the airport. If you see that some routes are operating also by rainbow, feel free to add REF to rainbow flight schedule. That is normal that I added most of the REFs, because I am the main editor of KTW Airport Wikipedia site.

It makes no difference what travel agency is provided in REF, because it is REF! REF is something that confirms the route. I would understand you, if I was putting travel agencies in the article, but I just add them to prove the routes as there is no other way.

Look at the other World's airports. Most of the airports use system like that. You just came there and started to delete the content. We are there to provide an actual schudeule out of the airports, and you are there just to devaste it! Stop doing that. A few days ago, another user explained you that these REFs are ok.

REFs 2

[edit]

I just though that the trouble can be in seeing the content of the REFs.

Please, could you tell me what you EXACTLY see, when you enter the REFs provided by me? You said about a blank page. What do yopu exactly see? throttleKTW 19:56, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lost on You Music (July 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 01:44, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lost on You Music (December 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 18:57, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lost on You Music

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Andrzej Rybkiewicz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lost on You Music, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:03, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lost on You Music

[edit]

Hello, Andrzej Rybkiewicz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lost on You Music".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:53, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lost on You Music (August 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TechnoSquirrel69 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 11:39, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for your comments TechnoSquirrel69, could you help me to correct the article? I think I have a problem of interpretation because to me it doesn't sound like an advertisement, it's just that what Lost on You does is important and deserves a place here. It's been more than a year and I'm still making the same mistakes, it's the first time I write an article here. Andrzej Rybkiewicz (talk) 21:13, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]