User talk:AngelOfSadness/Archive 3

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page

Thank you!

For fixing the mischief on my userpage while I was sleeping. Thank you dear! Ariel♥Gold 09:17, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, no problemo. :D AngelOfSadness talk 12:26, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for the warm welcome mate. If you ever need any help, (I'm not as wikiexperienced as you) you know where to come! Lunchscale 19:19, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Same to you too, if you need any help you know where to find me. And if you have any questions, I'll be happy to try and find solutions/answers to them. AngelOfSadness talk 19:23, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much. Lunchscale 19:24, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A quick question

Hi there again, just a quick question. Is there anywhere I can view new user account creations? Like a log of new users? Lunchscale 19:29, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes there is at Special:Log/newusers. You'll have to refesh the page every few minutes to view the newest account creations. AngelOfSadness talk 19:31, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a million mate. I'll leave you to do your anti-vandalism work. Lunchscale 19:33, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HELP

This is skooge talking about the SOC article i don't really get it what should i put on the article to keep it alive! Please let me do modifacations before you delete it please!

I can't delete the article on admins can do that. However currently, like I said on the article's talkpage, the article is lacking sources that back up it's notability. The article itself has no indication of how the subject is notable therefore it will be deleted unless you can make modification to the article indicating the subject's importance and significance i.e why should it have it's own article in an enclyopedia. AngelOfSadness talk 01:05, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

well its nobility i have it right here i have the website and all the info i said on the article would that help? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skooge229 (talk • contribs) 01:14, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The website in itself won't help the article establish notabilty. That needs to be done by independant third party sources. And I'm failing to see where in the article that says that the subject is notable. Read WP:WEB to find out what meets the notibility critera for web content. AngelOfSadness talk 01:18, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its famous because many people know about it and would like to see an article on it...I bet you one out of every 5 people who play Bf 2142 know about SOC —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skooge229 (talk • contribs) 02:01, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't even know what Bf 2142 is but the views of fans won't get it its own article. If it was mentioned in notable internet magazines well it might have a chance of it's own article. But without sources there's no article. There's no point having an article without sources. I mean not even Tribalwars has it's own website and literally hundreds of thousands of people know about that, the people who signed up to play it. AngelOfSadness talk 02:09, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Congrats

Thankyou very much! And thankyou also for your support in my RfA. I look forward to getting started. Best wishes, Lra drama 18:49, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shiny sorta

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For tireless efforts reverting vandals, I award you one of these sort of shiny star looking things. KnowledgeOfSelf \| talk 09:00, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for the barnstar :D. For a second there, when I saw the header in the TOC, I was like "Oh God another new editor who is angry at me for the deletion of their nonsensical/non notable article". And know you can see I'm very glad that it's a barnstar and not the latter. Thanks again. :) AngelOfSadness talk 14:49, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the revert, I was actually at the ready to do it myself, but I sometimes wait to see how long it takes before someone else can do it. I've had to wait 3 hours once! (though I wasn't online at the time) Happy editing. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 21:50, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo :D. I would have been four seconds faster only I wanted to open the user's talkpage and warn them at the same time as the revert. AngelOfSadness talk 21:53, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for updating, AngelOfSadness and Gscshoyru!

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my page! I now give the two of you the RickK anti-vandalism barnstar! -Go od sh op ed 23:49, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo. Cheers for the barnstar :D AngelOfSadness talk 23:53, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yay!!! -Go od sh op ed 00:01, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and I see that you've been involved with one of the Peewees. If you want to list an MO or evidence because we're doing a checkuser on him, go right ahead! -Go od sh op ed 22:40, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I am now :). I just added User:PeeWee McDonald to the Peewees sockpuppet page. I'll watch out to see if there are any more sockpuppets that haven't been added to the list yet. AngelOfSadness talk 22:50, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet. I'll be back tonight at 20:00 PST with updates. -Go od sh op ed 22:57, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I gots

Another stick of DDR RAM to put into my computer and now I have 768mb of RAM in my Computer so hopefully it won't freeze up anymore :D, it's super delicious fast now haha. --Diaboli 01:56, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No way I have the same amount of ram...I think.. yep I'm pretty sure its 768 or something like that :P AngelOfSadness talk 01:58, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

-nods- Now I just have to dust the bitch...my computer is like 2 or 3 years old now and its dusty as hell inside. --Diaboli 02:35, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Watch out for them computer bugs :D AngelOfSadness talk 17:53, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GlassCobra's RfA

		My RFA
		Hey AngelOfSadness! I wanted to say thanks a ton for your support in my request for adminship, which ended with 61 supports, 3 opposes, and 1 neutral. I hope your confidence in me proves to be justified, and please feel free to call on me if you ever need any help or opinions! GlassCobra 01:01, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on the on your successful adminship and you're welcome for the support. Good luck :D AngelOfSadness talk 20:43, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I

Really need your help to make a userbox, I tried to read the page how to do it and I got lost as FUCK XD. Make it Here? I know what I want in it...if you accept I'll tell you. --Diaboli 10:52, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I replied here. :D AngelOfSadness talk 20:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alesana off Watchlist?

Apparently, the person who "owns" the page can find every reason to keep it there, with a certain bias towrds labeling the band the most absurd genre. This is in regards to the Alesana page. I take it that it's off your watchlist? I've given up on trying to stick the right genre up there, the person who apparently "owns" the page (Ambrosia, I believe?) wont let me. I also saw that it didn't meet notability, however I was probably wrong with that one (Their "international" tour is between US and Canada. Go figure). Anyways, thanks for the help at the start, again. It's off my watchlist so I'm not going to go through that stuburn nonsense again. Was just notifying you, in case of something or another. By the way, can I ask where you got that WikiDefCon thing? Seems interesting. IronCrow 23:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think I took it off my watchlist about two days ago as it seemed the genre debate wasn't going anywhere and no official links were going to change that. Although I wonder if they know that no one "owns" the page even if they claim they wrote most of it or created it or whatever. The Wiki DefCon stuff can be found here. Hope this helps :D AngelOfSadness talk 23:18, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign my guestbook,and spread the word.

Heya,AOS,old friend! Could you please sign my guestbook? It's right here:User:Xterra1/GB.Or you can just click the orange in my *NEW* signature.--Xt e r r a1 23:36, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have fulfilled your request. I love the new sig by the way :D AngelOfSadness talk 23:38, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. =) That was one of the more unusual ones I've seen. I'm not sure where that came from. =\ The editor doesn't look familiar. -- Gogo Dodo 00:32, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo. The editor could be a blocked user seeking revenge on past encounters. But then again, they might have seen one of your edits on the RC and decided to have, what their idea of "fun" is. AngelOfSadness talk 17:35, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for the revert on my Talk page. Yet another one that I don't know where it came from. Oh, well, comes with the territory, I guess. Thanks again. =) -- Gogo Dodo 07:04, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again no problemo. AngelOfSadness talk 15:04, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks once again. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:47, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo. :D AngelOfSadness talk 18:48, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some thankyou spam

Thankyou for supporting my successful rfa which closed with 58 supports. If i am honest i am rather humbled by the unanimous support and i hope to live up to everyones expectations. If you ever need any help, don't hesitate to ask. Thanks again. Woodym555 13:38, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are very welcome and congrats on the successful adminship. AngelOfSadness talk 17:35, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

tell me please, what's it like in Ireland? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.175.98.237 (talk) 20:13, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!!

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For your great vandalism work, especially the revert of the vandalism on my user page. Thanks and keep up the good work!!!! Gonzo fan2007 ^{talk ♦ contribs} 21:34, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo and cheers for the barnstar :D AngelOfSadness talk 21:37, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of the entry "Mooker"

My creation of the post "Mooker" is really the nickname of Mark Kieso and is the title that he goes by. This is not a personal attack on Mark Kieso and I am sorry for the misunderstanding. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mkieso (talk • contribs) 18:27, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I accidentally tagged it as a personal attack and was in the middle of undoing it when the page got deleted. Anyway it still would have got deleted as it was a nickname of a person in an article that didn't assert the importance or significance of said subject. However I have seen that nickname being used in a disparaging fashion like here for example. Apparently its a disparaging slang term and creating an article with a disparaging slang term next to a living person isn't the sort of thing that isn't accepted on wikipedia per WP:BLP. But it's ok if you didn't realise this as you seem like you are new to wikipedia. Welcome by the way :D AngelOfSadness talk 19:56, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Secret page

I found it. :) KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 00:11, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know but it ain't my secret page. It belongs to <removed for the hell of it :D> if you check his userpage, it confirms this. And I too am waiting for my barnstar. :) AngelOfSadness talk 00:13, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I know, but since we are the only two, I thought I'd gloat with ya :P KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 00:19, 11 November 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Ahh I see. ~gloats~ We can really start gloating when we receive our barnstars and get to put them on our userpages for everyone to see. When he said he was going to do something to my userspace that had never been done before, I didn't know what to expect but he was right. No-one has done this before that I know of and we are the first people to find the page. ~gloats more~ :D AngelOfSadness talk 00:24, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The oppose bots' source

Thanks for the tip; I've blocked the account that created them all, as well as the socks themselves. Good work. :) Acalamari 19:03, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo. Hopefully now the nominees of Rfa can have a peaceful nomination time. AngelOfSadness talk 19:08, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

99 times?! What the hell?

Damn,girl,99 vandalisms?! Looks like you've earned a lot of ire from vandals. Keep it up,Xt e r r a1 21:04, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What written there is true, it's 99 vandalisms made to this talkpage. Waiting for 100. Should happen any day soon. :D AngelOfSadness talk 21:09, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Smile

NHRHS2010 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

NHRHS2010 talk 05:02, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

100

zOMGWTFBBQ!!!111!1111! - I just vandalized your talk page!!111! zOMGWTFBBQ!!!111!1111! - I just vandalized your talk page!!111! zOMGWTFBBQ!!!111!1111! - I just vandalized your talk page!!111! zOMGWTFBBQ!!!111!1111! - I just vandalized your talk page!!111! zOMGWTFBBQ!!!111!1111! - I just vandalized your talk page!!111!

Heh, should this count as number 100? :) KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 05:15, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This looks like vandalism. (I can't believe that an administrator is actually vandalizing AngelOfSadness' talk page just to get the counter to turn 100!) NHRHS2010 talk 05:30, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It totally counts as vandalism. I'm glad that it was a lot more original then what I usually get (e.g unimagnative attacks like "You suck"). It's unbelievable but I knew that once I mentioned that I was waiting for #100 that someone, like a respected editor, would go for it. But unlike what my user talkpage header says, this is going to be the only occasion where I will leave the vandalism intact. :D AngelOfSadness talk 17:32, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Naturally - I'd be insulted if you removed it! :D KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 18:36, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

12 times since this one eh. You are the popular one! KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 22:20, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

12 vandalism in 12 days aint so bad but I think I have to update the vandalism count as I think I have forgotten to update it in the last three days :) AngelOfSadness talk 22:26, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Make that 17 in 12 days, you'd swear I was on RC patrol all day but I've only patrolled a few minutes a day lately AngelOfSadness talk 22:29, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They love you - two days over 1000 edits and I've been attacked/vandalized twice. lol KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 22:36, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why me?Why is it always me they adore? But I don't want them to adore me, I want them to ignore me!!!. :D AngelOfSadness talk 22:48, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Got you again. 1500 edits in 3 days still just the two vandalism attacks. Oy vey. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 23:19, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My userpage hardly gets vandalised anymore, mainly because I got it protected because a dynamic IP troll kept returning. But luckily enough I don't get the same amount of vandalism that Jimbo gets on his userpage. AngelOfSadness talk 23:24, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

You do not even know what Alicja Boratyn and Blog 27 are, so dont revert my edits and call me a vandal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.21.76.254 (talk) 18:44, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First thing off, where is the assumtion coming from that I know nothing about these artists. Second thing the revert I did was accidental and then got distracted when reverting it back. And I'm sorry about that. Also please stop vandalising other articles like this and this. Those edits are considered vandalism and there's no denying that. AngelOfSadness talk 19:06, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The revert

Thank you again. :) Acalamari 20:31, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo :D. AngelOfSadness talk 20:32, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

my rfa

If you voted in my RFA...

...thank you for your participation. I withdrew with 83 supports, 42 opposes, and 8 neutrals. Your kind words and constructive criticism are very much appreciated. I look forward to using the knowledge I have accrued through the process to better the project. I would like to give special thanks to Tim Vickers and Wikidudeman for their co-nominations.

Thank you again and, best regards. VanTucky ^Talk

This RFA thanks was inspired by Lara❤Love's

My RfA

Thank you so much for voicing your support in my successful RfA. I'm humbled to have the community's trust. As I master the ways of the mop and bucket, please don't hesitate to message me for any advice or corrections. Cheers! Spellcast 00:18, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thankspam

Thank you...

...for your participation, criticism, and support in my recent RfA, which succeeded with a final count of 90/1/1. I appreciate all of your kind words, criticism, and suggestions. I extend a special thanks to Acalamari for his nomination, and Dihydrogen Monoxide and Husond for their coaching and nominations. If you need help in any administrative matters, please contact me.

Thank you again and, best regards,
Neranei
This RfA thanks inspired by VanTucky's which was in turn inspired by LaraLove's which was inspired by The Random Editor's, which was inspired by Phaedriel's original thanks.

dont delete me

please dont —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matt987654321 (talk • contribs)

I can't delete you, no one can. But you can be blocked from editing if you don't cease vandalising articles. AngelOfSadness talk 16:52, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

<cryptic grin> GlassCobra 16:54, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh cheers for that. First the guy pastes "I am a jerk" all over my talkpage then pleads to not be "deleted". Oh if only we could delete vandals or can we? <begins to stroke chin and shift eyes> AngelOfSadness talk 16:57, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ask and they shall receive ...

[1] - [2] - [3] - [4] - [5] :)

Looky at all the links! KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 18:24, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for that. I'm suspecting it was the same person as it was all over the Megadeth article in the last twenty minutes and they both asked to be blocked. Also the two IP's are in the same range as each other. Anyway thanks again and I'm sure the vandals would like to thank you too for blocking them. :D AngelOfSadness talk 18:30, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(Edit conflict) - Yes I'm sure he would. I'm only to happy to oblige. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 18:33, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now if only he could have understood that I couldn't "ban" him myself. But that's not as bad as what I got asked earlier. If only it were possible :) AngelOfSadness talk 18:37, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage

[6] NHRHS2010 talk 21:51, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for the barnstar and you're welcome. Your new "fan" has been blocked for a week if I can recall :D AngelOfSadness talk 21:53, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. I also thanked User:Edgar181, the blocking admin, for blocking the IP that vandalized my page. That IP vandalized my page perhaps because I have warned him/her for vandalizing someone else's user/usertalk page. NHRHS2010 talk 22:04, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's exactly what happened and they continued to vandalise many other userpages before they got to yours and I filed the almighty report and reverted their edits. Anyway we shouldn't see them for at least a week as part of the block prevents account creation. Hopefully they'll find something else to do in the meantime. AngelOfSadness talk 22:21, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arse bandit

I think you've made a BIG mistake. I've never edited the article "Arse bandit". I have already my own account. Reconsider what you write before you send it. Timpul 15:18, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied to Timpul on their talk page, one of the nonconstructive editors you warned, copied and pasted your warning onto Timpul's talk page, for some strange reason, and thus, it appeared you warned Timpul. I explained the situation, linked to the history to show it was an anon editor who added it, and hopefully Timpul will understand you were unaware of such a thing. Cheers, my dear Angel! Ariel♥Gold 22:43, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for that. I was getting really confused because I'm always careful of who I'm warning, and if I make a mistake usually I realise straight away and undo my edit. AngelOfSadness talk 22:46, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(EC)I always do and it wasn't me who put that warning on your talkpage. If you look at this you will notice an IP pasted that warning from somewhere else using my signature. If you had looked at this IP's talkpage you would notice I gave them a warning for vandalising a different article. Also if you look at my contributions, you would have noticed I reverted the IP's edit and warned them the exact same minute that they pasted the message on your talkpage. It's the IP address that owes you an apoligy, not me. Also by the looks of it they vandalised your userpage aswell before I found them. Maybe it's a dynamic IP/sockpuppet/blocked user that you had encounters with before? AngelOfSadness talk 22:44, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

E-mail

You have one. :) Acalamari 22:29, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now you have one :D AngelOfSadness talk 22:44, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have one back. :) Acalamari 22:51, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe there something from me in your emailbox now :D AngelOfSadness talk 23:07, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Back to you. :) Acalamari 23:33, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's a bleedin tennis match! KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 09:05, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, heh, it seems so! :) -- Acalamari 18:04, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm more a fan of badmintion myself ;D AngelOfSadness talk 19:03, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Comment about Problem

Hi AngelOfSadness, can you please take a look this discussion in reference to images that were uploaded from WWII in Color website, the copyright status is in question and there have been many users who are part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft who are upset about the Wiki Policy about image licensing WP:IUP. Thank you! -TabooTikiGod 07:40, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think my comments would help the discussion as ,quite frankly, the possible public domain/unknown copyright arguments have me divided. I've only started trying to gain understanding of the image policies and guidelines recently. I know there are editors on wikipeida that work mainly on images, and would know the policies and guidlines like the back of their hand. Unfortunately I don't have that volume of image policy knowledge to make a comment that would help the discussion along. AngelOfSadness talk 19:03, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

Hey, thanks for the revert! *Cremepuff 222* 01:25, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo. I saw a user called "Cremepuffhater" creating a section called Sockpuppetry on your talkpage abd put 25000 of content after it. Without having to read the message I reverted it and the user was immediately blocked (because of the username). Anyway, your welcome :D AngelOfSadness talk 01:28, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh, thanks again. That guy is starting to get on my nerves... *Cremepuff 222* 23:35, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo. I can't see why he keeps copy/pasting the same message though. AngelOfSadness talk 23:39, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure, I must have warned him for vandalism or blocked him or something. *Cremepuff 222* 23:42, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully he'll get bored after a few days and find something else to do. AngelOfSadness talk 23:44, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks2

Rjd0060 (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks for the revert, but I added it back. I don't mind the comments. The good, the bad, the ugly. lol - Rjd0060 (talk) 00:34, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo. I guess you are able to handle them better than me. :D AngelOfSadness talk 00:38, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, I don't let it bother me. I find occasional comments like that a bit humorous. Oh well, moving on....Thanks again. -Rjd0060 (talk) 00:43, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My revert

You're welcome for the revert. :) I think that vandal was a sockpuppet of Rockies9987. See this edit as evidence, and compare it with the vandal I just reverted and blocked. Also note that both Rockies9987 and Americatown target Cremepuff222 (who was mentioned in the recent vandalism), you, and I. Acalamari 21:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I knew I saw that vandalism somewhere before. I'll keep a eye out for any more sockpuppets because this guy keeps returning. AngelOfSadness talk 21:04, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've tagged the account as a suspected sock. At any rate, it's blocked. :) Acalamari 21:09, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's true if they are a sockpuppet or not, their edits showed that they weren't here to contribute to the project. AngelOfSadness talk 21:15, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Correct! :) Acalamari 21:19, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Malarc77

Hey, thanks for the revert, but I did actually ask that guy his opinion. Thanks again! GlassCobra 21:14, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I thought he was attacking you. He sure has a very strong opinion. :D AngelOfSadness talk 21:18, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AWOL

Sorry I haven't been around, my life kinda exploded around me, a whole bunch of shit has happened and i've just haven't been able to get online. And to top all that off Its REALLY hard to make a barnstar (for me at least I gets all confused) though I did get instructions on how to and it is an original idea for a barnstar (that everyone can use)....Glad you liked the page though hehe --Diaboli (talk) 02:38, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok, hopefully things will work out for you :D. If you want some help with the barnstar I could help. I should warn you that I have never made barnstars before but it shouldn't be too hard once you know what you want the barnstar to look like. AngelOfSadness talk 16:41, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i'll get the barnstar graphic done asap and send to you, then we can figure that shit out. Also last night I did something super bad on wikipedia but i HAD to do it....found this guys user page, and i loathe him (i know him from online forums and shit) I KNOW its the right guy cause he commented on the OiNK article and i know him from the site....and its funny cause no one has seen/caught me yet haha o dear, and don't you go reporting it! for once....--Diaboli (talk) 22:50, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok that's fine. Whatever you did, be it revenge from past encounters with the user, will probably/most likely have side effects when someone finds it. I would have recommended keeping a cool head while editing but I guess it's too late for that eh? I'm not going to go searching through edits to find it now as it's way after my bedtime and I still have a lot of stuff to get done. If I find out tomorrow that you've been blocked (Is it really that bad?) I'll take that as an indication that someone else has found it. Just, try to stay constuctive while editing on the next few hours. No point making matters worse. AngelOfSadness talk 23:27, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

eh im in no mood to actually edit stuff, i've done like 4 minor minor edits in the last 2 days, and that big ridiculous rant. It wasn't THAT bad, I mean I didn't do some mass vandalize and put untrue info and what not, i just went to the guys talk page, deleted everything off and told him that i hated him and he is a pretentious power hungry ass hole (but in like 40x more words) i might get blocked but only for a bit i think, i don't see me getting blocked for like....more than a week, if i do that is TOTALLY to much. --Diaboli (talk) 23:45, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The block should only be for a couple of days but it depends on the admin reviewing the case. One uncivil comment/rant wouldn't be a reason to have an indef block anyway so you shouldn't expect that at all. If it was just one comment and no more after that the block(if there is going to be one) shouldn't be for too long as it wasn't repeatedly done(I'm assuming). Or you might be warned and not blocked, again it depends on who finds the message and if they know what proceedures to follow. AngelOfSadness talk 00:02, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hi

safe blud how are you.... and before you call me a vandal... i am making informal and social forwardings upon your part. tssss —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pilsy10 (talk • contribs) 19:49, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of request for deletion of editor AngelOfSadness :)

AngelOfSadness, the editor you are, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that you satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space. Your opinions on yourself are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at User:R/EFD#AngelOfSadness and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit during the discussion but should not remove the editors for deletion template from the top of your userpage; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you, and have a good sense of humor :). -Go od sh op ed 23:06, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow this is just so unexpected. Well, first and foremost, I'd like to thank the academy...:) AngelOfSadness talk 23:17, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Huh?! -Go od sh op ed 23:19, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...I mean, just to be nominated in this category with so many legendary greats is just..Wow to me!!!... :) AngelOfSadness talk 14:48, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Once again, thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage. This is my fourth time already for thanking you for that. NHRHS2010 talk 05:33, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And now you are officially the editor who has given me the most barnstars. Cheers for the shiny and new barnstar :) AngelOfSadness talk 14:45, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, you are catching up to me! Oh yeah when I awoke this morning I had this - and this. That last one was pretty bad :/ KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 14:51, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How about that, I'm catching up to you with awards and you are catching up to me with vandalism on userpages/talkpages. And now a link to the best/worst vandalism I have ever gotten..ever! I have to admit it made me smile, oddly enough AngelOfSadness talk 14:58, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thank you, you know why. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 15:42, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Affirmative :) AngelOfSadness talk 15:44, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also want to thank you! --Oxymoron⁸³ 00:59, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcomo :D AngelOfSadness talk 14:23, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! You can thank others by using {{subst:Vangel}}! Rgoodermote 01:07, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks so much too! †Bloodpack† 05:58, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo. The vandal seemed to have had an interest in both of your userspaces. :) AngelOfSadness talk 14:22, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder why, I can see me but Bloodpack is a complete mystery to me. Rgoodermote 01:33, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Special Barnstar

		The Special Barnstar
		Your vandal fighting is excellent. Thankyou so much for reverting my userpage again and again, and updating the counter, which is kind of you. :-) I think I've already awarded you an anti-vandal barnstar, so I'll give you this one, for being such a special Wikipedian! :-) Lra drama 18:21, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for the barnstar and no problemo. Many people have reverted vandalism off my pages but I know it only on the rare occasion that the vandalism counter is remembered. But I guess those people are busy reverting the vandals unconstuctive edits and trying to convince them to persist. Anyway thanks again :D AngelOfSadness talk 18:45, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanky kindly miss. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 22:36, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo. If I find a persistant vandal, I will not cease reverting their unhelpful edits until I know that they have ceased their ways be it volunteery or by unfortunate force :) AngelOfSadness talk 22:39, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ;)

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For reverting vandalism off my user talk page Alexfusco5 22:55, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo :D AngelOfSadness talk 22:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My userpage

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. I appreciate it! S0me l0ser (talk) 23:05, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo. :D AngelOfSadness talk 23:06, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfA nomination

Nishkid64 would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Wikipedia:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Nishkid64 to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/AngelOfSadness2. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state and sign your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.

I will create the page if you choose to accept. I saw you were previously nominated a few months ago, but declined because you were inexperienced at the time. A few months have passed, and I believe you have gained the needed experience. I think you are fully qualified to be an administrator here, and I would be honored to nominate you. For my nominating record, see User:Nishkid64/RfAnom. Best, Nishkid64 (talk) 18:38, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ooooh - I've been watching for this. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 18:39, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First off, may I say thank you for your great support and also for waiting over a day for a reply. Really, it means so much to me that I can't even explain it and put it into words. Anyway, I've been thinking this over since yesterday and I'll think it's better if I wait until after Christmas possibly January. The main reason being I have stressful exams before Christmas and apparently, from what I've heard, Rfa's can be stressful so better to have the stress (if any) spread out if possible. There are still some things I want to do before starting the Rfa such as improving articles that I have promised myself that I would improve, create the article (that is currently userfied) in the mainspace, create some music templates (I know what articles need them badly) and do a bit more Xfd discussion participation. When I complete this list of things, I'll see how I feel about starting a Rfa but for now, at this moment in time, I'll have to decline this Rfa nomination. This is actually hard because part of me is screaming "Accept! Accept!!" but the other part is reminding me how my real life in the next two weeks will be: hectic, chaotic, insane seem to be the words that spring to mind. But it really really means a lot that you have so much faith in me and when I feel like I'm ready for an Rfa, I'll know who to go to for a nom but bear in mind it could possibly be a co-nom as a handful of people have asked me in the last two months. Again, cheers :D AngelOfSadness talk 20:42, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can respect and understand that! It reminds me of this conversation. Ahh the good old days! In the meantime I'll keep that dreadful red linked Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/AngelOfSadness2 on my watchlist and await it's wonderful change to blue! :) KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 03:11, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Christmas seems to get in the way of Rfa's. If I had accepted the Rfa now, chances are the list of things I have yet to do will be the reasons to oppose my Rfa (not much Xfd discussion, needs more contribution edits(creating article etc.) than vandalism reverts). If I were me I would probably oppose my own Rfa mostly because of my personal grudges with the user ;D. And also when the link turns blue, the page will appear at the top of your watchlist and that is also a wonderful change. Which reminds me to put that page on my watchlist, just in case someone nominates me without asking me first(which is what happened with the first Rfa in July). AngelOfSadness talk 12:33, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, AoS. Contact me whenever you're ready for RfA. Best, Nishkid64 (talk) 01:29, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism of Ecjmartin page

Thanks so much for reverting that! I deeply appreciate it!! - Ecjmartin (talk) 23:11, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo :D AngelOfSadness talk 20:42, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't

Get to big for your own shoes Lassy :], Im sorry im still AWOL. I hope you are doing good. -Happy feelings, Decon --Diaboli (talk) 13:05, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now who is spreading the rumour that I wear shoes, even if I do like the song :). Good to know you're still here and well ;) AngelOfSadness talk 21:07, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Cheers

Anytime. ff m 21:23, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks +barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For reverting vandalism off of my talk page and countless other userpages Alexfusco5 15:48, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo and cheers for the barnstar :) AngelOfSadness talk 15:49, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

I would like to apologize for that warning I gave a few months back. I have taken a break, and I know I should've assumed good, or at least neutral, faith. --Kannie | talk 01:36, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok as we all make mistakes. Happy Holidays! :) AngelOfSadness talk 10:52, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

james may - homosexual

it is said on top gear every episode im leaving a quote form clarkson, thats not violating anything!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hawk1410 (talk • contribs) 00:08, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know but Clarkson says it as a joke which doesn't need to be added to the article. But many people who read the article and don't know about the joke will take it seriously as it was under the personal life section. Qoutes by other people are hardly ever added to articles so either way it doesn't belong there as it is unreferenced and is breaking WP:BLP if it's really true. AngelOfSadness talk 14:01, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why -

- are you inside on New Years eve?! Go out and drink like all Irish people should be doing! :-D Take care! Happy 2008! Scarian ^{Call me Pat} 23:59, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I'm inside is because there is fireworks blasting off outside and they are scaring the c*** out of me as it is. Also I have drunk enough caffine today that I will probably be awake for the next four days. But Happy New Year to you too!! :D AngelOfSadness talk 00:17, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do hope that the asterisked word is "crap" and not the other word beginning with 'c' that I'm thinking of... Well, fair enough... Have a good one, pretty lady!!!! :-) Scarian ^{Call me Pat} 01:05, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is c**p not the other word that you may have been thinking of which is a lot worse :). AngelOfSadness talk 01:10, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes... worse word on the planet. Do you not swear? My apologies if I have soiled your talk page...! Scarian ^{Call me Pat} 01:17, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I swear a lot in my head but automatically those thoughts are censored before they escape my head so really what comes out is the equivelant of @~#[$@-", said exactly like that :D. And people are allowed to swear on this talk page so there's no need to apologise really ;) AngelOfSadness talk 01:25, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can I nominate you for adminship? Scarian ^{Call me Pat} 01:29, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While a part of me really wants me to be an admin, another part of me thinks I could do with a little more time doing major edits which I know will be a reason for people to oppose me currently if I don't fix that. Maybe in a few months time, I might accept an admin nomination but for now I would have to decline a nomination. But it means a lot to me that you would want to nominate me. :) AngelOfSadness talk 01:41, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]