User talk:Angela Criss

Consistent with the Terms of Use, Angela Criss has been banned indefinitely by the Wikimedia Foundation from editing all Wikimedia sites.
Please direct any questions to ca

wikimedia.org.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth · long-term abuse page

Vandalism

Stop vandalizing pages on Wikipedia, like you did with Mountain Dew. --ImhotepBallZ (talk) 00:41, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Hello, I'm Seaphoto. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Dollar coin (United States), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Seaphoto^Talk 00:46, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tituba with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eye snore 01:02, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Tituba with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Eye snore 01:03, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User talk:ImhotepBallZ, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Eye snore 01:16, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 01:24, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confession

@NinjaRobotPirate: Before I was sockpuppeting under Tamara787, I previously did sockpuppetry from 2011 until early 2013 under this account. You can have checkuser check the IPs, as well as the areas of interest, which correspond with many of my later accounts. Including this account, these accounts have not been tagged as my sockpuppets yet.

--Angela Criss (talk) 03:08, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll copy-paste what I said at User talk:2600:8805:2402:5A00:5962:CB30:6887:F022:

Disclosure of past sock puppets is one way back to the community, but you'll have more success if you follow the terms of the standard offer. Basically, this says to stay away from Wikipedia for six months, disclose your former accounts, and make an unblock request that explains how you'll behave differently. If your talk page access has been revoked, you can use UTRS or email an admin. It's not a rubber-stamp approval process, but many editors have been unblocked by doing this. On the other hand, if you're just bored and don't really care about being unblocked, maybe you'd rather edit TV Tropes or Uncyclopedia. Those sites have fewer rules and are more fun-oriented. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:57, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate: I am interested in taking the standard offer, which means I will return with an account for legitimate purposes in September (if I start now). However, is there any chance that you would confirm/run checkuser on these accounts listed above and tag them? --Angela Criss (talk) 04:01, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Don't create new accounts. That's sock puppetry and will be seen as abusive, even if you make constructive edits. Any accounts you make will be blocked, and their edits will likely be reverted. Instead, make an unblock request. All you have to do is read through this guide and follow its instructions. The process is easy and not very bureaucratic. I don't see a reason to go through old accounts and tag them; this is busy work. Just stop editing Wikipedia for a while, and it will count in your favor. It's that easy. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:19, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate: Gotcha. The only reason why I mentioned my older socks is because this account (the sockmaster for those sockpuppets) is older, so it would make more sense for Angela Criss to be the sockmaster instead of Tamara787. --Angela Criss (talk) 04:21, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Angela Criss, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Jdcomix (talk) 22:58, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Angela Criss, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

ZLEA _T\^C 21:44, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Angela Criss, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

ZLEA _T\^C 16:33, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Angela Criss, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

ZLEA _T\^C 15:21, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Angela Criss, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Lard Almighty (talk) 15:57, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Angela Criss, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

ZLEA _T\^C 02:43, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Angela Criss, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

ZLEA _T\^C 03:43, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Angela Criss, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

ZLEA _T\^C 16:04, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Angela Criss, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

ZLEA _T\^C 22:36, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Angela Criss, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

747pilot (talk) 02:53, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]