User talk:Animalworlds314

June 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 22:48, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Animalworlds314 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

3 months ago, I never understood that all of the edits that were made by me on list of mammals by location that are on BhagyaMani's watchlist are all based on the IUCN. I should have been a better editor if i had not made personal attacks against Elmidae and BhagyaMani, plus my disruptive edits and a dash of incompetence. I truly apologize of my bad actions that I did a long time ago. I should have never included badly sourced entries to many pages containing list of mammals by location to stick with the main theaters. However, I promise to this time function to any kind of degree on Wikipedia, understand that I cannot add badly sourced entries, as I need to follow the sources in List of mammals articles that use IUCN sources, do not make attacks against editors, no more creating disruptive edits that I did previously, adhere to rules and last but not least I will do my best to be a cooperative editor. Animalworlds314 (talk) 22:24, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:34, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.