User talk:Annamini
Hello, Annamini, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place "{{helpme}}
SFSU Class Project: A personal welcome from Anna
[edit]Dear student. Welcome. I think you may be part of the SFSU Class Project. Please write to me if you have any questions at all. I am here to help in any way I can. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:20, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Annamini vs Anna Frodesiak
[edit]Please see this. Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:37, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello. A group of editors has volunteered to assist you. We understand that editing Wikipedia can be quite overwhelming. We will help to ensure that your article(s) is presentable. This will allow you to focus on research and content.
Please visit this page: Wikipedia:WikiProject Classroom coordination/SFSU Class Project. You will find the following sections:
- Editors willing to help: Click "talk" to the right of an editor's name for assistance.
- Articles: Add the name of your article(s) to the list.
- Student list: Add your name to the list.
You can also get live help at IRC online help.
Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:43, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
Rebecca Harding Davis
[edit]Thanks for addressing my concerns. I have completed a more complete review of the article at Talk:Rebecca Harding Davis/GA1 with some specific questions about the work. You can edit the article directly in response to the questions or provide me with feedback on the Talk:Rebecca Harding Davis/GA1. maclean (talk) 04:16, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
GA status
[edit]You all have gotten some great feedback from the GA reviewer - - and it looks to me like you're very, very close to GA status. Congratulations! Now . . the final push. The two questions the reviewer raises that I might be able to help with: Life in the Iron Mills' status as pioneering document of realism; and, LIM's status within Davis's ouevre. For the first, you might look at the header notes for any Norton or Heath anthology of Am. Lit - - I have the Heath in my office, so remind me on Tuesday. Also, you might add this to your list of refs in re the claim about LIM in Davis's oeuvre: "Most readers agree that Life in the Iron Mills is Davis's best work." From Cecelia Techi, "Introduction: Cultural and Historical Background," Rebecca Harding Davis: Life in the Iron Mills, ed. Cecelia Tichi, NY: Bedfort St Martin's (1998). For certification of LiM's "pioneering" status: you might refer to RHD society page, the Heath Anthology page on Davis, the Legacy page on Davis, and Jean Pfaelzer's article in Legacy - - Legacy "LEGACY Profile: Rebecca Harding Davis, 1831-1910." Jean Pfaelzer. 7.2 (1990): 39-45. I think these two things - - LiM's "pioneering" status and its value w/i Davis's oeuvre - - are pretty much accepted as common sense within American lit. scholarship today. So, since it's pretty non-controversial - - it's going to be hard to find an article or writer explicitly arguing for or against these judgements. I think the best thing to do is to represent the ubiquitous status of these judgements, e.g. how they reflect the common sense of the discipline.
The other items/recommendations look fairly straightforward. Correct them and I think you'll clinch the GA status prize.
Congrats on your hard work! A job well-done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Profhanley (talk • contribs) 15:52, 7 December 2011 (UTC)