User talk:Anonymous615

Nashville skyscraper categories

Greetings Anonymous615, thanks for your recent work on the Nashville area building articles. I noticed you recently added Category:buildings and structures in Nashville to a number of articles. I have reverted these edits, since Category:Skyscrapers in Nashville was already present in these articles. Since that category is a "child" (a sub-category) of the one you added, there is no reason to use them both, since it just a replication of effort. The problem with the Nashville articles, however, is that too many buildings currently use the Skyscraper category, when they are definitely not of skyscraper-worthy height...I'm not sure what should be done in this instance, but I will try to think up something. In any case, cheers, and let me know if you have any suggestions. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 12:03, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nashville Metropolitan Statistical Area‎

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Nashville Metropolitan Statistical Area‎. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Orlady (talk) 19:06, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Central Parking Corporation

A tag has been placed on Central Parking Corporation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. LegoTech·(t)·(c) 18:08, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nashville, Tennessee

Thanks for restoring the panorama image on the Nashville page. To be perfectly honest, I just don't think Image:Nashville_day.jpg worked very well there. The pano provided a clearer view of the skyline...even if a couple of years old, the skyline hasn't changed dramatically enough to demand a replacement. Cheers. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 00:37, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Linking

Hi Anon615. When you are linking in articles, please don't link to redirects. For instance, you were linking both Nashville and Tennessee...just link to "Nashville, Tennessee"...it is much cleaner in appearance and function. Also, I'm wondering if we shouldn't be more strict in our definition of skyscraper in Tennessee articles...as I understand, the general convention is that a skyscraper is taller than 150 metres (492 ft). — Huntster (t • @ • c) 06:15, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Gaylord logo.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Gaylord logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? J Milburn (talk) 22:52, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Gaylord hotels logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Gaylord hotels logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:25, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki-meetup Nashville on Labor Day weekend!

Speedy deletion nomination of Music City Center

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Music City Center requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.nashvillemusiccitycenter.com/our-history. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. [ UseTheCommandLine ~/talk ]# ▄ 06:34, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]