User talk:ArabsofHyderabad

Welcome!

Hello, ArabsofHyderabad, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Mir Osman Ali Khan did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! 10mmsocket (talk) 08:21, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Mir Osman Ali Khan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Further, misleading edit summaries will tend to draw more scrutiny to your editing. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:58, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Mir Osman Ali Khan, you may be blocked from editing. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:15, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Hyderabadi Muslims. 10mmsocket (talk) 14:13, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

how should I add then ArabsofHyderabad (talk) 17:19, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good of you to ask! Take a look at the guide for citing sources in the section at the top of this page. If you have any questions, ask for help. 10mmsocket (talk) 17:56, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at List of Arabs by net worth. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:41, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mohammed Ali Abdullah Bwazir. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. r0paire (talk) 17:40, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Jubilee Kaman (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Jubilee Kaman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:41, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArabsofHyderabad! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 13:41, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 14:02, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi im sorry i have no idea what i did wrong i promise i wont do it again what page was this and what did i do wrong if you could clarify that would be appreciated ArabsofHyderabad (talk) 14:07, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After you last warning you vandalised A. C. Guards changing African to Arab; you then broke Barkas, Hyderabad deleting 773 byes leaving it in this state. In addition you the submitted Draft:The Jubilee Kaman with no content, then again with no sources wasting reviewers time - I suggest reading Help:Your first article. KylieTastic (talk) 14:22, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please help me make a wiki page 🙏 ArabsofHyderabad (talk) 14:29, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the info ArabsofHyderabad (talk) 14:35, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Daniel Case (talk) 14:04, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Shaikhaan Bin Shaikh Saleh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Shaikhaan Bin Shaikh Saleh, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Rusty 🐈 14:12, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Jubilee Kaman (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iwaqarhashmi was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Jubilee Kaman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Waqar💬 14:13, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 18:39, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ArabsofHyderabad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Subject: Request for Block Review and UnblockingDear Wikipedia Administrator,I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to respectfully request a review of the block that has been placed on my account. I understand that my recent actions may have violated Wikipedia's guidelines, and I sincerely apologize for any disruption this may have caused.I assure you that I am committed to following Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines going forward. I have reviewed the relevant rules and will make every effort to contribute positively to the community.Could you please reconsider my block and allow me the opportunity to continue editing? I believe that with this experience, I am better prepared to contribute in a constructive and collaborative manner.Thank you for your time and consideration.Best regards, User:ArabsofHyderabad 19:51, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

According to zerogpt, this request was written by an AI. We have no interest in AI chatbots editing here. Even if it wasn't, the request is essentially free of any meaningful content. Yamla (talk) 21:20, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.