User talk:Aradic-en

License tagging for Image:Balkans-political-1.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Balkans-political-1.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:07, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Closed surveys

Please don't add comments to surveys that have closed - firstly it is pointless & secondly it is against procedure. Thanks Johnbod 13:56, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Message

Jov' mi se priko harvuoske wikice. Onuod ćemo pruovjat priko munjopošte. Kubura 06:31, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Već učinjeno sinoć. --Anto 07:00, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Huh?

Why are you silently doing that... and most especially that? --PaxEquilibrium 11:24, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I could revert now and then you could revert back and irrationally get angry, starting an edit war...but why not evade that. Afrika paprika's policy should be abandoned by now. Let me hear what you have to say - or if you have got nothing to say, don't do that. ;) Cheers. --PaxEquilibrium 20:33, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Referring to what?? --Anto 23:05, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...the islands, of course. --PaxEquilibrium 12:05, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well? --PaxEquilibrium 11:33, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Island of Vukovar

OK I will look this article and if you want your future articles. Last 5 minutes I have been looking your edits. Please do not be angry but I think that your map need to be deleted. This is copy of another map ?? --Rjecina 18:51, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

which map?? --Anto 19:30, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

LOL, Anto, do you ever have an idea what are people talking about when they come to you? :))) --PaxEquilibrium 19:33, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do not get the point !

What is wrong and with which map??

specify , please! --Anto 19:40, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

I was referring also the the event to the up. --PaxEquilibrium 09:52, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I am making mistake but [1] this map I have seen on other places. Only difference for me is that name Croatia has been added to the map. I really do not know where I have seen that map before but.... Maybe PaxEquilibrium can remember from where is this map (if it is copy). I will not ask deleting of the map because I do not want to loose time looking for this map (looking for evidence that map is copy).

If it is OK for you in future I will look your edits. --Rjecina 20:15, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, you may do that, Rjecina. --Anto 20:50, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

I have more or less solved problem with Island of Vukovar (and lost with that 1 hour). If you want you can do something similar with Island of Šarengrad. Looking for data about Island of Vukovar I have come with data about Šarengrad. Look this statement of Croatian president:

http://www.predsjednik.hr/default.asp?ru=143&gl=200602070000007&sid=&jezik=1 --Rjecina 22:22, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The map is very bad, it presents the Balkans completely wrong, as if it's 1430 when it's obviously (to us Balkaners) not. --PaxEquilibrium 09:54, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Serbian lands

Was findest du wrong with the articel? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.110.201.154 (talk) 19:45, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Italian words in Croatian

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Italian words in Croatian, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Italian words in Croatian. Mysdaao ^talk 18:37, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please

Could you please stop adding useless comments to the talk page and read WP:POINT as well as the talk page guidelines? It's not really constructive at all. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 21:10, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My very first advice to you is:

Chill out, you're very tempered. :) Take a cup of coffee.
Be very careful with controversial templates, they will only get you enemies here and make you look bad to people who see your user page for the first time in their life. Cheers! --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 23:23, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ginjola

Pripazi na 87.9.234.210 [2]. Vrlo je moguće da sa ove ili slične adrese diluje Giove.
Be aware of that IP-address. It appeared about the time when Giove was banned. Kubura (talk) 08:02, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Aradic-en/Userboxes/anti-yugo

I have deleted this userbox, as I feel it is divisive and possibly inflammatory, along with the associated category (making "anti" userboxes or categories is generally not a very good idea-particularly user categories, of which all "anti" categories have been deleted). If you wish to recreate a similar userbox, I would request you reword it to be less divisive (and preferably not titled "anti-yugo") or it may run the risk of being deleted again. Thanks, VegaDark (talk) 23:56, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hi

Hi. I found you in the category of users who can contribute in English and Portuguese. I myself am a native speaker of English, but I'm well on my way to learning Portuguese. Just check out my user page and talk page, and join in any of the discussions. To keep updated, you can even put a watch on my user page, which will automatically watch my talk page. :-) learnportuguese (talk) 15:33, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Usebox:Antifasist

A tag has been placed on Template:Usebox:Antifasist requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:06, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Userbox:Free Kurdistan

A tag has been placed on Template:Userbox:Free Kurdistan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:06, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Userbox:Independent Chechenia

A tag has been placed on Template:Userbox:Independent Chechenia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:06, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Userbox:Independent Wales

A tag has been placed on Template:Userbox:Independent Wales requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:06, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Kosovo independence supporters

Talk:Pagania

Hi. You have edited on talk page in article Pagania about question if population of this state has been Serbs, South Slavs or Croats. After my comments on talk page that there is consensus between editors because result in user comments are 10:1 user in minority has demanded active discussion about this. Because of that all editors on talk page has been invited to write thinking so that this question ulmost 3 years after it is opened can be closed with vote.--Rjecina (talk) 00:11, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I am mistaking but my and your english skill are not good enough. Because of that during last months I have writen small number of articles and now I have made decision to become member of Counter-Vandalism Unit. If you are interested in that you can take template from my user page and put it to yours ? --Rjecina (talk) 19:41, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will! --Anto (talk) 11:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfM

Gladly, but how? -- Bojan 20:10, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of Yugoslavian breakup

Thanks for your help in editing article. I will be very happy if many users from ex Yugoslavia start to edit this timeline.

If I do not make mistake you editing for years after 1992 has been wrong because SFRY has dissolved on 27 April 1992 so she do not exist after this date. Question if Federal Republic of Yugoslavia is heir of SFRY is very controversial and it will be best that it is closed. Maybe is possible to create new article Federal Republic of Yugoslavia timeline ?--Rjecina (talk) 17:05, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Rjecina on this one. The Serbia-Montenegro-Kosovo case doesn't belong to the Yugoslavian breakup, as it was both already done and is under totally different circumstances and times. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 20:48, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Italy's expansionism

According to wikipedia expansionism is "the doctrine of a nation's expanding its territorial base" ... "usually by means of military aggression". Now, do you really believe that someone in Italy wants to start a military aggression to expand Italy's territorial base? I don't like Fini, but he said only that Rijeka is Italian, not that it must be part of the Italian Republic. I think he wanted only to say that the city was culturally shaped in an Italian cultural environment during the centuries. I think that he's quite stupid because he doesn't recognize that the city was a crossroad of many cultures, that Italians were only a plurality and just for a while, and because he doesn't care that he hurts the sensibility of an other nation, but I'm sure that neither he nor any of his comrades think about an expansion of Italy. Clap (talk) 16:57, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry. When they came to power the last time, they did not invade any neighbour, did they? Believe me, there's nothing to be worried about. They are only interested in revisionism (and now less than once), not in expansionism, including Menia. He's still not well-known in Italy, he's mentioned on the main newspapers only when he has headlines on Croatian newspapers (he has built his political career on the attention given to him by Croatian media), and it's unlikely that he'll become more relevant. And maybe they won't win... Clap (talk) 05:46, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tudjman i Djokovic

Video sam tvoju ideju. U principu je podržavam, ali mislim da treba dobro razmisliti o pitanju. Dve stvari meni padaju na pamet:

guidelines kakve su sada savetuju Tudjman i Djokovic, treba napasti samu smernicu WP:UE primerima same Wikipedie
bolje bi bilo proširiti temu i na ne južnoslovenska imena, tj. na sve koji pišu latinicom - Šveđane, Fince, Poljake, Špance, Čehe

U međuvremenu pogledaj User:Iricigor/diacritics, mada spremam drugu stranu koja bi se pozabavila istim stvarima, ali kroz pitanje "Use common English names or not". --Irić Igor -- Ирић Игор -- K♥S (talk) 12:33, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Franjo Tuđman

On user:Aradic-en demand I have started request for arbitration [3] . You are involved party in this request.--Rjecina (talk) 07:42, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not Slovenians

Aradic, don't jump to conclusions.
That user is not a Slovenian. AFAIK, our Slovenian colleagues on Wikipedia, never talked to me that way.
That unregistered user, that you've mentioned, was already blocked once because of his abusive language against Croat users (because they opposed to his POV attitudes), inflammatory messages and generally, for his misbehaviour [4]. Kubura (talk) 22:25, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also: don't feed the trolls by reacting to them. Ignore him. Admins 'll deal such cases. Kubura (talk) 23:34, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Adolfo Veber Tkalčević

A tag has been placed on Adolfo Veber Tkalčević, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Macy (Review me!) 18:56, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Basque/croatian wikipedia cooperation (updated!!!)

I saw your answer in my basque wikipedia user talk. I'll work in the article about the riot and translate it into basque. I'll tell you when it's finished. Anyway I think we can work in articles that are more general: there's not much information in the basque wikipedia about cities like Split, Zagreb or Dubrovnik. Those would be great to start.

See you soon--Trintxerpe (talk) 16:50, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aradic:

I already created the article about the 1990 Dinamo-Red Star riot in the basque wikipedia. You can read it here: [[5]]. I also created the articles about NK Dinamo Zagreb ([[6]]) and Red Star Beograd ([[7]]), though they are in a primary condition. I'll complete them progressively. If you have any suggestion about new articles relating Croatia or the Balkans, just tell me in my user page. Anyway, I think there's a lot of work to do in basque wikipedia about Balkans so I'll just slowly keep working.

I'm working in the translation of an article about an event in spanish political transition which happened in the Basque Country. When it's finished, would you like to translate it into croatian? Anyway, this work is still in a very preliminary state. In case that you agree, I'll let you know when it's finished.

PS:I have some problem with your e-mail adress so I put this here, hope you see it. Trintxerpe (talk) 08:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re. Vlado Gotovac

Hello Aradic-en. Sorry, but I don't have a formed opinion on the usage of this person's short name so I will not participate in this particular discussion. I should also say that usually it is not recommended to inform other users about ongoing discussions/polls, as other users may view that as canvass. Anyway I believe that your intention was just to provide a friendly notice, for which I thank. Best regards, Hús ö nd 16:24, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pagania

...I don't think that Arkan ever heard of it. :D

It's at the west, and the Krajina east of Skadar is the eastern. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 11:08, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, you're wrong. He noted in his speech Serb Slovenia as the most western land in the United States of Serbia. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 11:57, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He is a Montenegrin who was born in Slovenia, so I think he could've forget about his birthplace :-D --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 11:58, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re. Foolander

Hello Anto. I don't think PMAnderson means "Fool-land", but rather "Foo-land". In English, the word "foo" means something like "whatever it is", much like the "x" in Mathematics. I don't think any offense was intended. Regards, Hús ö nd 15:50, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:3RR violation

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 03:18, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|Hi I have reverted the page coouple times. I have not deleted any single source. On the other hand user :Kruško Mortale has deleted couple of mines. Including one from ICTY [here] thise source [8] I don't see why mine acts are beeing treated as vandalism??? --Anto (talk) 16:41, 23 June 2008 (UTC)}}[reply]

Yugoslav Wars

ICTY testimony is not accepted source (consensus about Yugoslav Wars sources)--Rjecina (talk) 20:26, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My appologies to you and all others that I offended.

Ja se ispricavam za sve uvrede koje sam pisao na diskusionim stranama nekoh artikala sa ciljem da dokazem neke fakte. Znam da se to ne radi tako i da je van svakog civiliziranog odnosa. Medjutm neki od vasih nacionalisticki obojenih clanova su vredjali mene takodjer, a ja sam odgovarao istom mjerom. Kako da jest, kako vrijeme prolazi sve vise uvidjam da sam pogrjesio pisuci uvredljive rijeci, kome i da se odnose. Zato, pokusat cu da ih izbrisem i da ih popravim u prihvatljivima za civilizirani razgovor. Osobno imam puno hrvatskih prijatelja, iako sam jugoslavenski orijentiran. Radi toga i radi svoje ciste savjesti, MOLIM VAS PRIMITE MOJE ISPRIKE jos jednom, i neka svatko bude ono sta se osjeca, a kada se pojave suprotna misljenja-treba se naci kompromis. Molio bih vas prenesite moje isprike Mir Harven-u, Anti Perkovicu, Zanaisu i svima sa kojima sam 'se svadjao' na wikipediji. Veliki pozdrav i neka je Bog i razum uz nas. Uzdravlje.24.86.127.209 (talk) 06:41, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to amend WP:UE

I just made a draft of a proposal to amend WP:UE to avoid "reliable source" misuse. Take a look and tell me what do you think. Admiral Norton ^(talk) 23:24, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sejdo Bajramovic

I would like to know where you procured your information regarding Sejdo Bajramovic. Bajramovic was not a Kosavar Roma. Why is is there no mention of his son Dragan Bajramovic who was murdered in Capljina, Bosnia and Herzegovina? Please check your facts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.165.6.110 (talk) 02:47, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Austrians

You know, between peoples, its like amongst the elves, there have been sunderings. Don´t regard Austrians to be Germans only both of them speak the same language or may have a simmilar ancestry. To speak with Tolkien again: The Noldor started to speak Sindarin in Middle-earth, but they didn´t become Sindar. Alike Serbo-Croatian doesn´t make a Serbian out of a Croatian... Ethnicity is, however, only a scientific construction, nothing you could touch. The boundaries are fluid. You could also have a look to the the Dutch history. Please read the discusion and don´t change articles only because of your personal feelings... It´s all about science. --193.170.52.132 (talk) 02:40, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re

Hello, Aradic-en. You have new messages at Baxter9's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--B@xter⁹ 14:08, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Europe 1430.PNG

The file File:Europe 1430.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 17:55, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]