User talk:Arrecife

Welcome!

Hello, Arrecife, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Kla'quot 07:56, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Croatia, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--Tomobe03 (talk) 19:05, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The spelling "Rfepublika Hrvatska" under [Croatia] is an obvious typo and I have a right to correct it. See the Croatian language entry at hr.wikipedia to verify that the correct spelling is "Republika".Arrecife (talk) 23:30, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Right, but in the process, you presumably accidentally, deleted bulk (125K) of the article the first time around - see article history.--Tomobe03 (talk) 00:25, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I'll forgive your mistake if you'll forgive mine. HTML has never been my strong point.Arrecife (talk) 01:25, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No harm done, I suppose. Cheers!--Tomobe03 (talk) 09:17, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of languages by number of native speakers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:47, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zarya Severa (June 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by FoCuSandLeArN was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Zarya Severa instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zarya Severa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 01:57, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Arrecife, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 01:57, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

You are falsifying sources at List of languages by number of native speakers. This is a violation of WP:RS and WP:SYNTH. If you continue to WP:EDITWAR, I will request to have you WP:BLOCKED. — kwami (talk) 00:18, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Zhuang languages

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Zhuang languages (autonym: Vahcuengh (pre-1982: Vaƅcueŋƅ, Sawndip: 話僮), from vah 'language' and Cuengh 'Zhuang'; simplified Chinese: 壮语; traditional Chinese: 壯語; pinyin: Zhuàngyǔ) are any of more than a dozen Tai languages spoken by the Zhuang people of southern China in the province of Guangxi and adjacent parts of Yunnan and Guangdong. The Zhuang languages do not form a monophyletic linguistic unit, as northern and southern Zhuang languages are more closely related to other Tai languages than to each other."

It says quite clearly that Zhuang is not a single language, and this quote comes directly from wikipedia. I do not see how I am falsifying anything, and I would like to see you quote any source that says that Zhuang is a single language. Arrecife (talk) 00:41, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fraud with an excuse is still fraud. — kwami (talk) 04:41, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Zarya Severa concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Zarya Severa, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:43, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have replaced it with Zarya severa (lowercase) in accordance with scientific use. Feel free to delete the draft version. Arrecife (talk) 17:52, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zarya Severa

Hello, Arrecife. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Zarya Severa".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. The StormCatcher (talk) (contribs) 10:33, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have replaced it with Zarya severa (lowercase) in accordance with scientific use. Feel free to delete the draft version. Arrecife (talk) 17:52, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Arrecife. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Soviet Union poster. You, if you are not yet a member of the cooperative – sign up immediately.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Soviet Union poster. You, if you are not yet a member of the cooperative – sign up immediately.gif. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:30, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Arrecife. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Arrecife. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Arrecife. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciation (April 2020)

		COVID-19 Barnstar
		For all your good work on 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Washington (state) ☆ Bri (talk) 03:43, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I think that's a compliment! I know that the very best doctors are honoured by having diseases named after them...Arrecife (talk) 04:18, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/Canada medical cases by province: NS numbers

Per today's update, Nova Scotia's current numbers are:

 Tests: 46,668 + 1,061 = 47,729
 Cases: 1,061
 Deaths: 62
 Active: 5
 Recovered: 994 ("Resolved")

Could you make the changes? I'm not yet confident I'd get all the 'downstream' numbers correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmdyck (talk • contribs) 00:12, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done! NS figures are in some disarray. Arrecife (talk) 03:15, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I was expecting the national Tests number to change, but I guess you source that number from somewhere (as opposed to just adding up the province/territory numbers). Nova Scotia's numbers have indeed had problems, although it looks like they'll be better starting today. Jmdyck (talk) 03:38, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Now I see what you mean - I have altered them again.Arrecife (talk) 03:48, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gothic Revival architecture

Hi, thanks for your interest in the above. Would you be able to add a cite for your addition re. Londonderry Cathedral? I've put quite a lot of effort in to try and bring the article up to 2020 citation standards, and we shouldn't be adding a fact, or ending a paragraph, without a formatted cite. Many thanks. KJP1 (talk) 06:45, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done!Arrecife (talk) 15:10, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Markup generator for Washington COVID cases template

I have created an online spreadsheet that automates generation of the cases/100k column. See the template talk page and the template source. EphemeralErrata (talk) 05:59, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"through the previous day"

Hi, I added the above phrase because Washington has a case reporting cutoff of around midnight. Thus, the report on the 22nd included cases from the start of the pandemic through the 21st, but not any reported on the 22nd. (Whereas other health departments report whatever was in their computer system at the time the report was run.) I did not mean for the phrase to describe the interval of new cases in the update. I was looking for a succinct way to indicate 11:59PM / midnight / 12:01AM without having to be specific - and also something that doesn't need constant updating. Do you have an alternate suggestion? EphemeralErrata (talk) 18:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have gone back to the old formula.Arrecife (talk) 01:04, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All the numbers, except incidence, in the county table are in units of "people." Thus vaccinations should be number of people vaccinated, not doses given. There's a choice of vaccinations initiated (i.e. first dose) or vaccinations completed (i.e. single injection or series done.) As first doses have a bigger epidemiological impact, that's the number I've chosen to report for the states I update. This can be found in the middle column of the html table below the dashboard. EphemeralErrata (talk) 20:28, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll leave vaccines to you for the time being.Arrecife (talk) 04:43, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Goss (Baritone) (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Kammill were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Goss (Baritone) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Goss (Baritone), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kammill ⟨talk⟩ 08:13, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:John Goss (Baritone)

Hello, Arrecife. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John Goss (Baritone), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nabataeans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Akkadian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COVID-19 Barnstar

		COVID-19 Barnstar
		Thank you for all the updates that you do for Covid Canada articles Moxy- 19:48, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx! Arrecife (talk) 22:12, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Google Translate, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Uyghur and Rundi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected!Arrecife (talk) 06:13, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello, I'm Belbury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, England, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 18:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I provided a better source, I hope this works. Arrecife (talk) 17:35, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tierra del Fuego. Graham87 14:07, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will do better next time. Arrecife (talk) 16:25, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Arrecife And at Etruscan civilization. (cc Graham87) Bazza (talk) 10:00, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 11:41, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Enough is enough. Graham87 11:41, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]