Jump to content

User talk:Sampf

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Artworkintl)

Artworkintl, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Artworkintl! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Yale Harris (March 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
JSFarman (talk) 20:10, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mark Yale Harris, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:05, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mark Yale Harris

[edit]

Hello, Artworkintl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mark Yale Harris".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:08, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

 Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:32, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Sampf (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #23272 was submitted on Nov 15, 2018 18:54:22. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 18:54, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am changing the username to comply with policy and then requesting a block be removed from this account. Thank you very much.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Sampf (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

to comply with username policy am requesting a change of username Artworkintl (talk) 20:38, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Your requested new username looks good. I've renamed your account to the new username, and I'll go ahead and unblock you. Please note that Wikipedia is not for advertising or promotion and editing or contributing to article subjects where you have a conflict of interest is not acceptable practice. Aside from this, I wish you well and I wish you happy editing. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:46, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Artworkintl (talk) 20:38, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. You are now free to move about the cabin. ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:47, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

== On 12/4, I received the message below from Worldbruce from Help (thank you, Worldbruce, for your input). It mentions 5 inline citations, yet I have submitted many revisions and there are now 24 verifiable citations. Are the revisions not being seen? Thank you. Hi Sampf. To submit it for review, click the blue "Resubmit" button in the pink box at the top of the draft. Before you do so, note that the issues raised in the March 2017 review have not been adequately addressed. The five inline citations (one of which is to Wikipedia, which is not a reliable source) support, at best, 15% of the draft. If you can't cite a reliable published source for something, remove it. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:47, 4 December 2018 (UTC) == Sampf (talk) 18:58, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

[edit]

Please help me with the timing on the review of a draft article on Mark Yale Harris (last submitted with changes in December). Thank you.

Sampf (talk) 16:17, 8 January 2019 (UTC)Sampf[reply]

It has not been resubmitted for review however it may take anywhere from 1 hour to 2 months or more. Praxidicae (talk) 16:38, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As a side note, Sampf please review Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy. Praxidicae (talk) 16:39, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mark Yale Harris, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:45, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mark Yale Harris

[edit]

Hello, Sampf. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mark Yale Harris".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 11:37, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mark Yale Harris

[edit]

Hello, Sampf. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mark Yale Harris".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:27, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

[edit]

Hello - The article on Mark Yale Harris has the following banner: "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. Please discuss further on the talk page. (March 2020)"

This was addressed to Wikipedia's satisfaction in 2018 in that I provided the requested information regarding conflict of interest and changed the user name. The article was then on the Wikipedia site after that with no banner. I do not understand what is being asked of me at this point. Thank you for your time.


}} Sampf (talk) 19:42, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sampf, Its saying that the article itself needs review to ensure that it is neutral and properly written. Nothing more needs to be done on your part. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 20:40, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]