User talk:Aryanshukla9936

This is Aryanshukla9936's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

collapse old discussions

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clash Night Tv (November 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jovanmilic97 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please consider adding reliable secondary sources to help the notability of the subject before submitting again.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clash Night Tv and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Clash Night Tv, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:16, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aryanshukla9936! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:16, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clash Night Tv (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pythoncoder were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs additional reliable independent secondary sources, preferably not in screenshot form.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clash Night Tv and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Clash Night Tv, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 16:23, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Clash Night Tv has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Clash Night Tv. Thanks! — pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 16:24, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Aryanshukla9936! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! — pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 16:24, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Speedy deletion nomination of Clash Night Tv

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Clash Night Tv, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Daiyusha (talk) 13:01, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Aryanshukla9936. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Clash Night Tv, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Daiyusha (talk) 13:07, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aryan Shukla

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aryan Shukla requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sam Sailor 13:20, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at Aryan Shukla, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Please stop the attempts to use Wikipedia as a medium for promoting yourself and your business. Sam Sailor 13:23, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 13:27, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Aryanshukla99.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Aryanshukla99.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 13:46, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aryanshukla9936 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think there is any misunderstanding from Wikipedia I have never been soamming or advertising any thing i have been searching for random articles and editing them as i Love to do it. I just tried to make a missing article and i was Blocked

Decline reason:

All of your contributions were in violation of WP:COI, WP:PAID, WP:PROMO, WP:NOTE, and WP:AUTOBIO. As you think there's been no violations, we cannot unblock you. Yamla (talk) 14:26, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block evasion

This user has engaged in block evasion as Aryanshukla87 for months, most recently in July, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 10:35, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user has submitted UTRS ticket #28203 claiming that they have not used sockpuppets for at least 6 months, and that User:Shivmagari is not related to them. This user has unfortunately been socking today as User:Ajmahajan78, amongst other accounts. Results have been reported to the SPI case. ST47 (talk) 08:06, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aryanshukla9936 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Wikipedia admins i was blocked some months ago then i used my another account on wikipedia for editing but yesterday that was blocked due to being sockpocket of this account. But i request you to please unblock my accounts as i have understood my mistakes and the way of writing articles. And i promise and make sure that i will not be doing any mistakes in future

Decline reason:

In order for an unblcok even to be considered, you would need to address and show understanding of all of the various rules you have broken here (including the abuse of multiple account, block evasion, undisclosed paid editing, Terms of Use violations, non-neutral content, advertising and promotion, spam... the list is extensive). Since this unblock request does not do that in any way, I am declining it. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:11, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Over on User talk:Aryanshukla87, you lied and pretended to be unrelated to this account. I'm happy to see you've changed your approach, but you'll need to address your attempt to mislead us, as well as your violations of WP:EVADE and WP:SOCK. So far, you've gone out of your way to prove you can't be trusted and shouldn't be unblocked, so you'll have to work hard to regain the community's trust. I suggest you start my modifying your unblock request to address this. --Yamla (talk) 12:19, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aryanshukla9936 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Admins, I Aryan Shukla an Wikipedia editor apologizes for breaking the rules by abuse of multiple account and using the Wikipedia with multiple accounts but now i understand the issues and promise to not do that , block evasion , undisclosed paid editing as i used promotional type of articles and now i will next time keep in mind to use appropriate articles, Terms of Use violations, non-neutral content and using promotional words , advertising and promotion as my words promoted the subject but now i will revise the article before publishing it, spamming the wikipedia by creating same articles many times. I really apologize for all my wrong acts and request to take off the charges from me. I spent yesterday full on Wikipedia rules and regulations and also guides to be an ownest and professional Wikipedia editor and i promise to not do anything that may create an abuse to the wikipedia rules. I also apologize that i lied about my another accounts to the community and i promise to not repeat that again Thanking you, Aryan Hope you understand

Decline reason:

according to Yamla's note above, This user has engaged in block evasion as Aryanshukla87 for months, most recently in July, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 10:35, 3 July 2019 (UTC) The earliest one could hope for would be January, 2020. Assuming no further block evasion. Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:59, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You want to immediately remove that unblock request. It doesn't come remotely close to addressing the problems with your editing. If you leave that unblock request in place, you are likely to lose access to your talk page to prevent you wasting any more of our time. You are welcome to make a new unblock request, but need to specifically address the multiple concerns listed. For example, you lied to us about your other account, destroying the community's trust in you, but haven't mentioned that at all. --Yamla (talk) 13:37, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Sir i mentioned that i did make a new account and i lied about that and i am really sorry i am now feeling guilty for my mistakes and really i promise to not break the community trusts again. Really sorry from my heart Aryan 13:59, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

As promised, I have revoked talk page access. You either lack sufficient competence to edit here or aren't listening to us. Another admin will be along shortly to review your unblock request. If it is declined, I suggest you attempt to earn back the trust of the community that you worked so hard to break, by going at least six months with zero edits (with this account or any other), then use WP:UTRS to apply for an unblock under the terms outlined in WP:SO. Your path will be difficult given how you worked hard to demonstrate your bad intentions. --Yamla (talk) 14:03, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PS user must also deal with copyvio's. Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:02, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]