User talk:Ashleytspain
Welcome!
Hello, Ashleytspain, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 20:46, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
September 2009
[edit]
Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Ashley Tisdale discography. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.—Kww(talk) 16:37, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Ashley Tisdale. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This is particularly true of contentious subjects like her voice range. —C.Fred (talk) 20:46, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Also, if you're going to change sourced information, as you did at Ashley Tisdale discography, make sure to replace the old source with the new source that provides the updated information. If you don't have a source, don't change it. —C.Fred (talk) 20:49, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Also, you don't seem to understand what an "associated act" is. Please read Template:Infobox musical artist for the definitions of the various fields in the infobox.—Kww(talk) 20:48, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Inflation of sales with no source
[edit]If you're going to inflate sales figures, please find a reliable source.
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Ashley Tisdale discography. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. - eo (talk) 12:24, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Associated Acts
[edit]Please read Template:Infobox musical artist, and see how it describes "associated acts". None of the edits you are doing to the associated acts fields are correct.—Kww(talk) 14:14, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. You were cautioned that the associated acts you were adding to the Ashley Tisdale article did not meet the guidelines for associated acts. You then re-added them without discussion (diff). Please use the next 48 hours to review the guidelines that other editors mentioned above. Once the block expires, make sure that any content you add to articles meets the guidelines and project definitions and is verifiable to reliable sources (i.e., no rumours about future projects or dating). —C.Fred (talk) 16:41, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- Additionally, please review Help:Minor edits. None of your edits to Ashley Tisdale today were minor, yet you flagged them as such. —C.Fred (talk) 16:45, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
November 2009
[edit] Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Ashley Tisdale. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. This includes her vocal range and dating history. —C.Fred (talk) 23:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
October 2011
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Ashley Tisdale has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Wikipedia has a policy called "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball", which discourages such edits. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reference to a reliable source. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 18:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Please do not add to filmographies, films or television programs that are not yet in production. This is a violation of the Wikipedia policy WP:CRYSTAL and the guideline WP:NFF. If you have a reliable source describing Tisdale's participation in an upcoming project, then you can add a short mention in the text of the article with a citation. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 19:12, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Ashley Tisdale. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Elizium23 (talk) 22:58, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ashley Tisdale, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Elizium23 (talk) 15:37, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
To back up Elizium23, you are edit warring, and that is unacceptable. Don't try to get content included by simply adding it over and over and over until other editors give up. Once an addition is reverted, it is the person adding the material that is responsible for getting a consensus that the material should be added. If you add "Under Construction" to the Tisdale article again without having started that discussion and gained that consensus, I will block you.—Kww(talk) 15:41, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
- I see you've re-added Under Construction to the table without so much as a peep on the talk page. As a result:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.