User talk:AustralianThreston

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Threston Surname

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Threston Surname, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://eol.org/collections/97809.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:10, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sir Richard Threston (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Draft:Sir Richard Threston.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:31, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! AustralianThreston, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:31, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created Sir Richard Threston, and I noticed that your username, "AustralianThreston", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Trammel Museum of Art". However, you are invited to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA", "Jack Smith at the XY Foundation", and "WidgetFan87". Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Moreover, I recommend that you read our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please create a new account or request a username change that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Your username suggests that you may have a personal conflict of interest with respect to the multiple articles you have created in the subject area of Threston. I strongly suggest that you please read the COI guidelines. Hasteur (talk) 17:34, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well thank you for taking the time to explain that to me. I do apologize. I did not know.--AustralianThreston (talk) 12:00, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I'm pretty sure this warning is placed in error. If your username represented a company, that would be a violation. In this case, it appears to represent a person named Threston from Australia, who happens to be interested in the history of his family name. No issues here. Carry on! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:39, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing wrong policy wise with this username, as stated at your name change request. Mlpearc (open channel) 18:21, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sir Richard Threston, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sacerdos. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sir Richard Threston.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sir Richard Threston.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:27, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John J. Threston for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John J. Threston is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John J. Threston until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:07, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All articles, sources and citations are real and legitimate. This person is notable due to his political involvement in Pennsylvania and while decedent related material isn't criteria for inclusion in this case it is a supporting factor. Requesting page protecting to avoid small mined people tampering again. --AustralianThreston (talk) 11:56, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There are criteria for requesting page protection and they don't apply here. Also, I recommend you avoid throwing around insults like "small mined people", especially if you won't bother to spell correctly. Wikipedia is not here for you to accomplish stuff and you would do well to help us build an encyclopedia before you attempt writing articles on your own. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:54, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And I quote directly from Wikipedia "On Wikipedia, notability is a test used by editors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article. Information on Wikipedia must be verifiable; if no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article. Wikipedia's concept of notability applies this basic standard to avoid indiscriminate inclusion of topics. Article and list topics must be notable, or "worthy of notice". Determining notability does not necessarily depend on things such as fame, importance, or popularity—although those may enhance the acceptability of a subject that meets the guidelines explained below."

How can someone with verifiable, credible THIRD party references and sources be deleted. Especially when it is made a stub to allow more time to collect additional information and sourcing. --AustralianThreston (talk) 19:30, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with John J. Threston. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 13:11, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sir John Threston for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sir John Threston is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir John Threston until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:46, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Threston (surname) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Threston (surname) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Threston (surname) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:02, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And I quote directly from Wikipedia "On Wikipedia, notability is a test used by editors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article. Information on Wikipedia must be verifiable; if no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article. Wikipedia's concept of notability applies this basic standard to avoid indiscriminate inclusion of topics. Article and list topics must be notable, or "worthy of notice". Determining notability does not necessarily depend on things such as fame, importance, or popularity—although those may enhance the acceptability of a subject that meets the guidelines explained below."

Kindly tell me how a word, a town and surname that all have third party sources can possibly be deleted. --AustralianThreston (talk) 19:27, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of T.R. Threston for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article T.R. Threston is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T.R. Threston until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:03, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And I quote directly from Wikipedia "On Wikipedia, notability is a test used by editors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article. Information on Wikipedia must be verifiable; if no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article. Wikipedia's concept of notability applies this basic standard to avoid indiscriminate inclusion of topics. Article and list topics must be notable, or "worthy of notice". Determining notability does not necessarily depend on things such as fame, importance, or popularity—although those may enhance the acceptability of a subject that meets the guidelines explained below."

Kindly tell me how a person with credible, verifiable third party sources is up for deletion. --AustralianThreston (talk) 19:28, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sir Richard Threston for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sir Richard Threston is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir Richard Threston until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:18, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sir Edward Threston for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sir Edward Threston is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir Edward Threston until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:32, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Sir Edward Threston and T.R. Threston. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Edison (talk) 19:25, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have been posting on the appropriate pages for deletion and being ignored. Kindly tell me how someone with credible, verifiable third party sources and references is up for deletion and meets all other nobility requirements. --AustralianThreston (talk) 19:31, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The merits of each article can be discussed on their respective AfD pages. Other editors do not have to discuss with you if they don't wish to. After enough editors have registered opinions, an admin will determine if there is a consensus for or against deletion and act accordingly. If you can make a good case or improve each article, you might forestall deletion. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:00, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T.R. Threston could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:02, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Finngall ^talk 22:04, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FUCK OFF! I deleted the entire page. As I have repeatedly said I AM NOT T.R. Threston but if any of the slanderous things written by the staff on Wikipedia remain, I'm sure a law suit will not be far behind. And people wonder why Wikipedia isn't allowed as a reliable reference for REAL research. I certainly know why now!! --AustralianThreston (talk) 22:08, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:12, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: T.R. Threston

Hello AustralianThreston. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of T.R. Threston, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: speedy deletion declined - you are not the only author of the article. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 22:14, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 10:43, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]