User talk:BRACK66

Welcome!

Hello, BRACK66, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 21:16, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

England cricket team

In an attempt to put an end to what could become a slow and tedious edit war, why do you keep mentioning England's forfeited match to Zimbabwe at the 2003 WC in the tournament history section? It's for the final position of the team, not mentioning what happened in individual matches. Nev1 (talk) 21:28, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers

For numbers less than 10, the general rule is to write them out in letters. It is for that reason that I changed your edit at Manchester United F.C. to read "four League Cups" instead of "4 League Cups". Thanks. – Pee Jay 00:12, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chelsea F.C. Honours Section

Please, stop editing the Honours section. It is correct how it is. Archibald Leitch (talk) 23:30, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Crown Prosecution Service. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rodhull andemu 17:04, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Crown Prosecution Service, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Leave it out, please. Rodhull andemu 16:59, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Scottish Football Association. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. Monkeymanman (talk) 21:53, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Birmingham City Honours section

Hello, and thanks for trying to improve the Birmingham City F.C.#Honours section. Just to let you know that the reason it doesn't need League One as well as Third Division / Division Two for the 3rd-tier honours, is that they were runners-up in it when it was called Third Division, and won it when it was called Division Two, but they haven't played in it since it's been called League One. It's different from the 2nd-tier honours, which were won under all three names Second Division / Division One / The Championship. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 16:36, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Celtic FC

Thank you for experimenting with the page Celtic F.C. on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed as it is considered unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Pointer1 (talk) 00:35, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Chelsea F.C., did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 13:44, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Club infoboxes

Hi, this is not the first time but I hope it is the last time you change the infobox without the season has ended. Until ALL matches has been played, no updates should be made. Please keep this in mind. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 09:48, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I gave you a response at my talkpage, no changes shall be made until season is over and you keep doing these changes over last couple of weeks (even twice at Chelsea) is disruptive, which was the warning I gave. Qed237 (talk) 11:08, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Putting Arsenal as third is definately not good as they have not even secured 3rd place, but I will assume very good faith and remove the level3 warning this time. If this disruptive editing continues it will return together with a final warning. Please wait until season has ended. Qed237 (talk) 11:30, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Northamptonshire County Cricket Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gillette Cup. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Liverpool F.C.–Manchester United F.C. rivalry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intercontinental Cup. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Manchester United F.C.. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:37, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, BRACK66. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User:Walter Görlitz. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 00:04, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: UEFA competitions

It doesn't matter if the Cup Winners' Cup is defunct, United won it, and in the hierarchy of UEFA competitions, the Cup Winners' Cup will always come higher. – Pee Jay 00:29, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, BRACK66. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited England cricket team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hamilton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited England cricket team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hamilton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Major/minor competitions

Where did you get that definition from? I've never seen such a definition written down. If you have, I'd love to see it. – Pee Jay 22:30, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is quite clear the Community Shield is not a major competition. The Club World Cup is. The Uefa Super Cup is. The Community Shield is not. Only you seem to be disputing it?! Why? Vanity I'd say!! BRACK66 (talk) 00:18, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No need for the personal attack, fella. I'd just like you to substantiate your claims with something more than your own opinion. Personally, I would say the Super Cup and Club World Cup are also minor competitions, and removing those would further reduce the number of "major" trophies won by Alex Ferguson, so I'm not sure where vanity comes into the equation. It all comes down to a need for reliable sources to back up your assertions. You've been on Wikipedia for a while, so I'd have thought you'd know this. – Pee Jay 11:14, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe, but we'd need to find a source that backs up the idea of those competitions being major/minor. I would also recommend going into searching for such sources as something of a blank slate. Don't go into it hoping to find sources that back up your point, but look for sources, see what they say, and modify your view accordingly. – Pee Jay 11:22, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, BRACK66. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rathfriland Rangers F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aaron Black (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Plurals

You realise this edit is wrong, right? – Pee Jay 10:39, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you not listen to me? This is not the correct way to pluralise "trophy". – Pee Jay 09:21, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Honours won by club

Liverpool have 64 honours, as the Wikipedia article includes the League (Screensport) Super Cup and Sheriff of London Charity Shield as trophies. BRACK66 (talk) 11:43, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18 leagues, 7 FA Cup, 8 League Cup, 15 Charity Shields, 1 Super Cup (=49), 6 European Cup, 3 Uefa Cup, 4 Uefa Super Cup (=13), 1 World Club Cup(=1). Total is therefore 49+13+1 = 63. Koncorde (talk) 12:08, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, just clicked what you are referring to. I have never seen the Sheriff of London Cup given parity with the other trophies before in any article or sources. Think the main article needs looking at. Koncorde (talk) 12:26, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Can you exolain why please? Thankyou. BRACK66 (talk) 00:52, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain why please. Thankyou. BRACK66 (talk) 00:53, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hello, I'm Jaellee. Your recent edit(s) to the page Pep Guardiola appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Jaellee (talk) 18:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

England national rugby union team Featured article review

User:Bumbubookworm has nominated England national rugby union team for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:12, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Why?!

Well, for one thing, I'm not a moderator. Second, why do you think? The edit you made was not accurate as Manchester United and Liverpool are currently level on trophies won, at least for the next few weeks. – Pee Jay 09:29, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not according to Wikipedia's own "Trophies won by club" article they aren't!! You might like to do your research!! BRACK66 (talk) 09:53, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've done plenty of research, thanks. Wikipedia cannot be a source for itself, you should know that by now. – Pee Jay 10:35, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass other editors. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 13:32, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022–23 FA Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wimbledon. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Wales national football team, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 07:32, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was originally an edit, which then went wrong. I hadn't intended to delete anything.

My apologies. BRACK66 (talk) 07:59, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]