User talk:BYF079

Océano Club de Kerkennah

Hello I saw that you work on the article of Océano Club De Kerkennah before. I will ask you if you have some other informations about this football team,which you can add on the article??? I search on internet many hours but i dont find anything which is not wrotten on the article.

Thank you very much Vernito

January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It would be appreciated if you would not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with User:MQDuck/userboxes/Right To Resist. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Equazcion •✗/C • 13:17, 15 Jan 2008 (UTC) 13:17, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi, Thank you for your reply. Wouldn't it be just fair to apply the same principals to you as well, meaning: if you oppose an idea...don't just go ahead and mark it for deletion ..instead discuss it and talk about it as you said!

Salam

Assalam Allaykom (Peace be upon you)

i have noticed that you are interested in the Arab World and its Culture, i would like to Invite you to Join the Arab Wiki Project.

our goals are to Increase the Public's Awarness and Develop Articles that are related to the Arab world, and help each others to achieve it, we are all good in certain things, so why not complete each others to make the Arab world a more Understood region for readers in Wikipedia...

i hope you join in, and get to explore the Project more, and add your name as a member in the Project...

Ma Assalama (Peace be with you)

--Arab League User (talk) 05:27, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tunisian Ligue Professionnelle 1 2006-07

I moved it to match the title of the main article: Tunisian Ligue Professionnelle 1 as should be the case. If this article title is wrong, please move it.

Also, do not mark my edits as vandalism. Doing so using Twinkle may result in your permission to use the tool being removed. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 08:05, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. I see you've reverted quite a few of my edits. This is not a readable article - we do not need massive copies of the club badges - the table is more than sufficient to provide the information. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 08:09, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, when you want to add more than one template to an article, you can nest them, i.e.

This removes the spaces between the templates and makes it look better. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 08:27, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Are you Tunisian soccer fan? Do you follow Tunisian soccer? Do you know how crazy Tunisians are about soccer?

It's quite significant to have the logos in every single article. To indicate the history and the differences. so please could you not do any cleanup in Tunisian soccer related pages unless you open a discussion about it, please. Also I'm well aware of the space that the layout leaves...and you think it looks better but it's not a fact ...since there was no survey about it.

One quick question: Why was your page Vandalised more than 15 times??

BYF079: "Faïcel Ben Yedder" (talk) 08:38, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but it isn't significant, and it isn't necessary and it makes the article much harder to read. Have a look at Premier League 2007-08; this is the kind of thing you should be aiming for. If you disagree, please bring it up on WT:FOOTY. As for the spaces between the boxes; if people were happy with it, they wouldn't have developed the nesting technique.

My userpage has been vandalised by morons who don't understand that articles about their 5-a-side football club, or ones that advertise their company, have no place on Wikipedia. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 08:45, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But who decides what goes into wikipedia and what doesn't?

Twinkle warning

Do not use Twinkle for edit such as this or this. Claiming other users' edits are vandalism when they are clearly not amounts to improper use. Next time you use it improperly you be reported and possibly have your privelege to use it removed. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 09:26, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you really think I am only here to delete things, have a look at User:Number 57/New articles - this doesn't even include the 50+ articles on Israeli villages I have created recently. I don't have time to go around every group of articles, so if you know of something which isn't standard, then try to fix it yourself. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 09:36, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NOT EVERYTHING HAS TO BE SLANDERED...THERE SHOULD BE DIFFERENCES!

There is another reason you can't include the club badges (I had suspected it, but wasn't sure) as under fair use rules you can only use them in the article about the club itself. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 09:44, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I'm not slandering you, I'm just pointing out how things are generally done. We have to make the articles as readable as possible. Your contributions are more than welcome - Tunisia is probably one of the best covered African leagues thanks to your work. However, we all need to accept constructive criticism - when I first joined most of my edits were corrected, and now I look back at some of my early work, it is embarrasingly bad. I don't want to drive you away from Wikipedia, but please accept some advice. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 09:46, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

That isn't the case if the article is still related to Tunisian football. Do you think that this is standard: Ligat ha'Al 2007-08 why don't you make it look like the English premiere league. Please give me some time and I'll make all those page and quite standard in my own way.

It is the case. Fair use rationale only allows the badges in one article, i.e. that of the club - have a look at the explanation in Image:Ipswich Town badge.gif. You cannot justify its use in season-by-season articles as it is not needed to identify the subject in them.

Aside from the map (which is a useful picture), the Ligat ha'Al 2007-08 is fairly standard, i.e. Introduction - League table - Results - Top scorers - Templates. I wouldn't have organised the results like that, but it doesn't make it unreadable. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 10:00, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And the fact that the articles stayed deleted showed that I was justified in deleting them. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 10:45, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Jaysweet (talk) 12:33, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

userbox relocation

Hi, just a heads-up that a userbox you have on your pages (interest in conspiracy theories) has changed location to User:Sappho'd/Userboxes/Conspiracybutnoreptoids

Cheers. Drywontonmee (talk) 07:03, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Compione_tn.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Compione_tn.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 03:46, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:G2ness.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:G2ness.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:35, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unused football kit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:54, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tunisian football club logos

Because logos are only allowed on Wikipedia under a Fair Use rationale, which their use on the Tunisian league page would not qualify for. – Pee Jay 14:20, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, the reason for this is that logos are copyrighted, and so Wikipedia would have to pay a license fee in order to use them. However, since Wikipedia is "the free encyclopedia", this is not possible. Fortunately, there is something known as Fair Use, which allows the use of copyrighted material in special circumstances where the use of the logo significantly increases the understanding of the article. Using the logos on the Tunisian League 2008-09 page does not qualify as fair use as using them there is essentially decorative and does not help to increase the understanding of the article. Hope that explains it. – Pee Jay 09:10, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:CS Hammam-Lif-Shirt-2006.gif

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:CS Hammam-Lif-Shirt-2006.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC) --Skier Dude (talk) 05:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Esp sp tunis arabic-05.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Esp sp tunis arabic-05.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 23:21, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Esp sp tunis 80's.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Esp sp tunis 80's.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:24, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Esp sp tunis old.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Esp sp tunis old.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:24, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Logos on Commons

Your logos uploaded to Commons are for speedy deletion. See Commons:Village pump#Unfree images. Fair Use is not was never accepted on Commons, you dont have the holder of copyrights, the painters, ~~the FIFAs permission~~, you uploaded the images under a wrong claim of authorship in many cases, your licensing with commons:Template:Attribution is different to your claimed "fair use". --Martin H. (talk) 17:01, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed one reason, appears to be your website. --Martin H. (talk) 19:16, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According to your post: ???.

What should this mean? I deleted the images from Commons according to our copyright policy. The Logos are probably protected by copyright, the copyright belongs to the individual clubs - not to you or your website. So without a written permission from the clubs that everyone can use their logo for every purpose including unrestricted commercial use the logos are simply unfree. See commons:Commons:Licensing#Acceptable licenses - the second part of this paragraph says:

For example, the following are generally not allowed: [...] Copyrighted symbols, logos, etc. (Not to be confused with trademarks.).

I gave you 2 days to provide permission indication or at least to response, you did not do anything. So the Logos had to go for breaking the law. --Martin H. (talk) 12:43, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You had the time. If permission is given to unrestricted commercial use for everyone (not only you, not only wikipedia - everyone) it should be no problem for you to forward you permission to OTRS and you images can be restored. Without a written permission from every single copyright holder for every single logo the deletion is totaly ok. No fair use on Commons - maybe you mixed this up with the rules on en.Wikipedia. --Martin H. (talk) 21:23, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This was not your serious answer... I just told you with a link: Fair use is not accepted on Commons. It was never and it will never be accepted. And you realy wounder, why your images on Commons are deleted and you logos on Wikipedia under fair use still exist? You uploaded logos on wikipedia are under fair use and part of Wikipedias unfree content. --Martin H. (talk) 21:43, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:CLP-2 Seasons

Template:CLP-2 Seasons has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Jameboy (talk) 13:58, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

hi BYF079 you are tunisian so help achieve our origin tunisian wikipedian language, the tunisian native wiki project is not yet but in text in wikimedia and in hold this deppend how much articles we need many of good quality to finaly realease our tunisian wikipedia language "edarja etounsi" this the main page that we need to work at and to developed [1]

Elly mino (talk) 20:28, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Stade-Gabesien.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stade-Gabesien.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Fb competition 2009 CCCup

Template:Fb competition 2009 CCCup has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 14:50, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Fb competition 2009 CCL

Template:Fb competition 2009 CCL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 14:50, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Fb competition 2009-10 CCL

Template:Fb competition 2009-10 CCL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 15:21, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Kit left arm ESBK 1.png

The file File:Kit left arm ESBK 1.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Kit right arm ESBK 1.png

The file File:Kit right arm ESBK 1.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CA Bizertin Old.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CA Bizertin Old.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:19, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CA Bizertin Shirt-08.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CA Bizertin Shirt-08.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:19, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CA Bizertin Var.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CA Bizertin Var.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:20, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]